Is Moon the Best Low-Budget Sci-Fi Movie of Recent Years?

  • Thread starter Thread starter solar71
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Scifi Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the low-budget sci-fi film "Moon," released within the last 3-5 years, which has garnered mixed reviews. While some viewers appreciate its atmospheric quality and emotional depth, particularly praising Sam Rockwell's performance, others find it slow-paced and lacking in psychological thrill. Comparisons are drawn to other low-budget films such as "Europa Report," "Cargo," and "District 9," with participants noting the challenges of producing compelling sci-fi on a budget. The conversation highlights the evolving landscape of low-budget sci-fi, emphasizing the potential for quality storytelling despite financial constraints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of low-budget film production techniques
  • Familiarity with sci-fi genre conventions and themes
  • Knowledge of notable low-budget sci-fi films like "Moon," "Europa Report," and "District 9"
  • Awareness of the impact of CGI advancements on film production
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the production techniques used in "Moon" and its impact on viewer perception
  • Explore the narrative structure and themes of "Europa Report" for comparison
  • Analyze the cultural implications of "District 9" and its commentary on social issues
  • Investigate the evolution of low-budget sci-fi films in the context of technological advancements
USEFUL FOR

Film enthusiasts, independent filmmakers, and anyone interested in the evolution of low-budget sci-fi cinema will benefit from this discussion.

solar71
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Anyone else seen this somewhat low budget Scifi movie?

Its not that old, say maybe 3-5 years. Called "Moon"
Very cool with a lot of atmosphere.

If you haven't seen it yet, do yourselves a favor and do so.

Anyone else a fan?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's pretty good yeah - similar in feel to Silent Running and Sunshine only more bite.
There is a lot of good stuff at the lower budget end.

Also see event 16 and Monsters for what can be done at the ultra-low budget end.
 
It's not bad, I wouldn't consider it the best science fiction of recent years by a long shot (unless you are only counting film, a poor medium for science fiction IMO).
 
I'm sorry, I disagree. It's not terrible, but I found it to be boring and much less psychologically thrilling than I had hoped.

I would recommend "Europa Report" which is another low-budget film (it's idependent) about a crew that goes to Europa to probe the icy waters and report back. It's made in documentary form so you get a realistic feel. With moon, I just couldn't buy it.
 
I found it to be boring and much less psychologically thrilling than I had hoped
Well it is slow paced and not actually intended to be a psychological thriller so fair comment.
 
I really enjoyed it. And what's not to like about Sam Rockwell?

Cargo is another relatively unknown sci-fi film.
 
Funny, just before logging to PF I was listening to



IMHO music is the best part of the movie, but the movie is not bad. Just not convincing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ref Best SciFi in a long time. Moon

Sadly true IMHO

I went in expecting little but came out pleasantly surprised..worth watching that's for sure.
 
@Fermifaq:
Welcome to PF;
It just got eclipsed by Gravity though didn't it?

Note: sci-fi is quite difficult to get made ... producers seem to have the impression that they don't do very well for the outlay. That is slowly changing as CGI gets cheaper - but you still have costumes and physics to get right without turning it into a college lecture.
 
  • #10
Yes, the best thing about Moon - but the special effects are pretty good for a low-budget production - is its emotional quality. I.e. the music, and Sam Rockwell looking even worse than usual.

Right now, you should review Elysium and District 9 side by side. As not-bad as Elysium is, District 9 was probably the most original SF in a decade.
 
  • #11
Did anyone else pick up on the little detail that the company was Korean? I don't think it was coincidental - I believe it was to capitalise on Korean researchers being in the limelight for mammalian (and human embryonic stem cell) cloning (including the Hwang scandal, etc.).
 

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
35
Views
21K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K