Is my book making an algebra error?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
ozone
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Not sure if this is a notation error or an algebra or if I am wrong , but my book presents a system of equations and I cannot get it into the form which it is presented

[itex]\tau _b = \left(1 + \frac{\Phi _b}{c^2}\right)\text{ }\text{$\Delta $t}[/itex]

[itex]\tau _a = \left(1 + \frac{\Phi _a}{c^2}\right)\text{ }\text{$\Delta $t}[/itex]

[itex]\tau _b = \left(1 + \frac{\Phi _{b-}\Phi _a}{c^2}\right)\text{ }\tau _a[/itex]

Just wondering if I am missing something obvious here or if they are performing black magic. I tried subbing in for delta t and then doing long division but my answer was slightly different from their form.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ozone said:
Not sure if this is a notation error or an algebra or if I am wrong , but my book presents a system of equations and I cannot get it into the form which it is presented

[itex]\tau _b = \left(1 + \frac{\Phi _b}{c^2}\right)\text{ }\text{$\Delta $t}[/itex]

[itex]\tau _a = \left(1 + \frac{\Phi _a}{c^2}\right)\text{ }\text{$\Delta $t}[/itex]

[itex]\tau _b = \left(1 + \frac{\Phi _{b-}\Phi _a}{c^2}\right)\text{ }\tau _a[/itex]

Just wondering if I am missing something obvious here or if they are performing black magic. I tried subbing in for delta t and then doing long division but my answer was slightly different from their form.

Could it be that they are making an approximation under the assumption that ##\frac{\Phi_a}{c^2}## is much smaller than 1?
 
Ahh I suppose that you are probably right.. thank you.