Is my use of ##e_x## in my solution for Fluids Angular Momentum correct?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to fluids and angular momentum, specifically focusing on the use of a unit vector in a solution. The original poster seeks clarification on the correctness of their notation and reasoning regarding the representation of a unit vector in their solution.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions their use of the unit vector ##e_x## and considers whether it should be expressed differently. Some participants suggest alternative methods to approach the problem, such as applying conservation of angular momentum and taking moments about a specific axis.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the original poster's notation and explore different methods of solving the problem. While some participants provide suggestions, there is no explicit consensus reached on the correctness of the original notation.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates that the problem is not homework as they have already solved it, but they are seeking deeper understanding of their reasoning. There is mention of a figure and attachments related to the problem statement and solution.

member 428835
I don't typically do this, but attached is a figure with a problem statement. This is not homework because I have already solved it! My question is a subtle one.
Please see the attachments, one is the question and the other is my solution.

I know my solution is correct, but at the end of equation (2) I wrote ##n = e_x## where ##e_x## is the unit vector in the ##x## direction. At the time I am not sure why I wrote ##e_x## this way, because I now think it should be ##\cos \theta e_x + \sin \theta e_y##. Any help here would be awesome in understanding why what I had was correct.

Thanks so much.
 

Attachments

  • solution.png
    solution.png
    82.3 KB · Views: 613
  • problem.png
    problem.png
    68.3 KB · Views: 701
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bibleman
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not going to try to follow your intricate algebra, but I will suggest an easier way. Take moments about the sprinkler's axis and apply conservation of angular momentum. What is the tangential velocity of the jet in the ground frame?
 
Tangential velocity is ##-r \omega + Q \cos \theta / 3 A##.

I think I know how to solve the problem assuming velocity out of the sprinkler pipe is constant (or rather averaged), but I want to make sure I can do it both ways (the way you mention above and using integrals).

Thanks for the reply
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bibleman
Never mind, I figured it out. For others, in case they want to know, I'll attach the solution.
 

Attachments

  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bibleman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K