Is Operating a Pressure Vessel Above MAWP Safe at Ambient Temperatures?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the safety and legality of operating a pressure vessel at its Maximum Allowable Working Pressure (MAWP) of 150 psi at ambient temperatures of 70ºF, with a relief valve set to 165 psi. According to ASME Section VIII, Division 1, a relief valve must be set at the MAWP, and the absence of a dual rating on the vessel's nameplate limits operational flexibility. Recertification for a higher MAWP is complicated and typically requires the original manufacturer’s involvement, making it more practical to consider purchasing a new vessel. The legal implications of operating uncoded vessels vary by state, with some states allowing more flexibility than others.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ASME Section VIII, Division 1 regulations
  • Knowledge of pressure vessel design and safety standards
  • Familiarity with relief valve requirements and settings
  • Awareness of material stress limits in pressure vessel construction
NEXT STEPS
  • Research ASME Section VIII, Division 1 compliance requirements
  • Learn about pressure vessel recertification processes and challenges
  • Investigate the implications of operating uncoded pressure vessels in various states
  • Explore the design and purchase options for new pressure vessels
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, safety inspectors, and facility managers involved in pressure vessel operations and compliance, as well as anyone responsible for ensuring safety standards in industrial settings.

Sh1ps
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A pressure vessel is stamped with an MAWP of 150 psi at 450ºF.
We are operating at 120 psi at ambient temperatures around 70ºF.
Is it allowed to operate at the MAWP with a relief valve set to 165 psi if operating temperatures are always at the ambient level.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi, welcome to the board. I'll assume Section VIII, Div 1 for this discussion, but I believe the other divisions have the same requirements. Please verify which division of the code the vessel is built to.

Take a look at UG-119. That shows what the nameplate should look like. If it has a duel rating (ie: higher pressure rating at a lower temperature) then it should show on the nameplate.

Para. UG-125 provides requirements on setting the valve. In short, you have to set a minimum of one relief valve at the MAWP of the vessel, not higher. The code allows for a second device to be set at a higher pressure, but you need one at the MAWP.
 
Q-Goest,
Thanks for the quick response.

Yes, Section VIII, Div 1 was used according the drawing I have.
There is no nameplate but the stamped info does not show a dual rating - so no luck there.

Am I correct in assuming that using a lower temperature rating would allow for a higher MAWP if we could go for recertification (we would like to run at 150 psi) so really only need to increase the MAWP to 165 or maybe 170 psi.

I have no experience of doing this but could imagine that it may be simpler to buy a new vessel rather than go through the hoops of recertification of a 10 years old vessel.
 
The MAWP wouldn't necessarily be higher for the lower temperature. The rating depends on the material's allowable stress which for most carbon steels, doesn't change between 100 F and 450 F.

I've not heard of pressure vessels being recertified and restamped. It might be possible, but you'd need to have the original manufacturer do that because they're the ones that have all the analysis on it. If I had to guess though, I'd say your chances are slim to none.

There may be one out for you, though I wouldn't recommend it. The code is recognized and legally binding in most states in the US. However, Texas, SC and a few other states don't have a law requireing vessels to be stamped. In those states, it is up to the vessel owner to do what they see fit. In those states, companies generally use the code since it provides them considerable legal protection. However, I've seen companies use uncoded vessels in those states.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
80K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K