Is Over 100% Solidity Normal for Wind Turbine Blades Near the Hub?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the solidity of wind turbine blades, specifically questioning the occurrence of solidity exceeding 100% near the hub of a 6-bladed turbine design. It is established that a solidity greater than 100% is not normal, with typical values ranging from 7% to 30% for most modern horizontal axis wind turbines (HAWTs). The conversation highlights the importance of the tip speed ratio and provides equations for calculating various parameters, emphasizing that a higher blade count increases solidity but is unconventional. The user is advised to verify calculations and consider efficiency guidelines when assessing turbine design.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wind turbine design principles
  • Familiarity with solidity calculations in aerodynamics
  • Knowledge of tip speed ratio and its significance
  • Proficiency in using Excel for engineering calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Wind Turbine Solidity Calculations" for detailed methodologies
  • Learn about "Tip Speed Ratio Optimization" for efficient turbine performance
  • Explore "Aerodynamic Principles in Wind Turbine Design" for advanced insights
  • Examine "Excel for Engineering Calculations" to improve computational skills
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, wind turbine designers, and students in renewable energy fields seeking to understand turbine performance metrics and design optimization strategies.

fugg
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello. I'm calculating the different parameters of a turbine design but I have some trouble with the solidity. The solidity near the hub exceeds 100%, but is an average of ~27% for a 6 bladed turbine. I'm just wondering if anyone has had experience in turbine design and if +100% solidity is normal (i.e. normal for blades to overlap each other near hub) or not. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have a little experience in wind turbine design, and no a solidity of greater than 100% is not normal. A wind turbine with 6 blades isn't normal either. Solidity over 10% of the entire turbine is relatively uncommon for most modern HAWTs.
 
As the blade count increases, the solidity naturally does too. Sorry it wasn't 27% I was thinking of a different figure, but ~12%, which given that a 3 blade turbine would be ~9% seems reasonable. A 6 bladed turbine is indeed not conventional, but noise and tip speed ratio are my priorities hence the blade count.
I'm attaching an Excel sheet detailing the calculations. Am I missing something very obvious? The following equations were used:

Tip Speed Ratio: λ= ΩR/U, at distance r: λ_r=λ r/R
Angle of relative wind: φ= 2/3 〖tan〗^(-1) 1/λ_r
Local cord length: cl= (8πr/(BC_l ))(1-cosφ)
Optimum solidity for B blade number: σ≅ B/Nπ (N∑(i=1)(cl/R))

N=number of blade sections, 10 in this case.
Doesn't copy very well but you get the idea. I assumed the Coefficient of lift (Cl) to be 1 across the span to make it simple though I don't think it's too much of a stretch?
 

Attachments

Aww, no one has worked in wind turbine design?
 
The equations you have listed are correct. It is easy to check your work, just do a few hand calculations to confirm the equations have been properly entered.

As for the results you should get solidity between ~7% (although single blade designs are even less) and ~30%. To check a specific turbine make sure that in the case of a high solidity the tip speed ratio is low and for low solidity the tip speed ratio is high. There are equations for finding the most efficient ratio, but not all turbines are efficient so use this as a guideline and not a rule. To make this simple I have attached a graph of solidity vs tip speed ratio.



www.charlieseviour.co.uk
 

Attachments

  • tsr_vs_solidity.jpg
    tsr_vs_solidity.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 788

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
22K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K