Is Packaging Design Wasting Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter airborne18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Marketing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy waste associated with packaging design, particularly in consumer products like cereals. Participants explore the implications of packaging size, material use, and shipping efficiency, raising concerns about wasted space and energy in both transportation and retail environments.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that a large box of Corn Flakes was mostly empty, suggesting that packaging is designed to create the illusion of more product, leading to wasted space in shipping and storage.
  • Another participant mentions the disclaimer about settling during shipment, indicating awareness of this issue but questioning its adequacy as an excuse for packaging design.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that the energy costs associated with packaging materials and the concentration of products could be significantly reduced through smarter packaging solutions.
  • One participant points out that grocery stores sell products by weight, not volume, and that they often calculate cost per ounce, which influences purchasing decisions.
  • Another participant shares insights from a factory tour, stating that the nitrogen used in packaging is necessary for product freshness, suggesting that not all packaging practices are merely marketing gimmicks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the necessity and efficiency of current packaging practices. While some agree on the wastefulness of excessive packaging, others defend certain practices as essential for product preservation. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the full impact of packaging design, including assumptions about consumer behavior, the necessity of certain materials, and the balance between product preservation and waste reduction.

airborne18
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I just opened a box of Corn Flakes, the huge box, and it was basically half full. So the other half of the box was just wasted space.

Just think of how many products are shipped in containers that are cleverly designed by marketing people simply to convince us we are getting more product than they actually deliver.

How much space is wasted in each truck traveling down the highways so company X can convince us to upsize our purchase.

How much space in a store is wasted because of packaged air.

The average Walmart store gets two trucks per day. Just one company could save a lot of energy. Plus shipping it to the distribution centers in the first place.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
they often have "Some Settling During Shipment May Occur" disclaimer.
Not that its an excuse.
 
No kidding. And this applies to other aspects of packaging, such as the materials used, the concentration [dilution] of liquids and powders, and the energy cost per pound of packaging material. From a technical point of view, the solution is a no-brainer, and the benefits of smart packaging would would be significant.
 
For things that settle, they also have to sell contents by weight of product, not by volume. Furthermore, most grocery stores calculate cost/oz, which is what I always go by when I purchase widely available food types, not their particular brand names.
 
I've seen various products like cereals or chips featured on "how it's made," and the person giving the factory tour said that the nitrogen bubble that they put in the bag is truly needed to preserve the freshness of the product and that it's not some gimmick to short change you. Whether or not you believe that is up to you I guess.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K