Is Periodicity Preserved in Relativistic Phenomena?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Eynstone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relativistic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the preservation of periodicity in relativistic phenomena, specifically contrasting general relativity (GR) and special relativity (SR). It concludes that periodic functions in one reference frame do not necessarily remain periodic in another moving frame, as demonstrated by the transformation of functions like f(t) = sin(wt) versus f(t) = ct. The concept of clock synchronization in SR is addressed, emphasizing that small clocks can maintain synchronization due to the equivalence principle, which supports the validity of periodic phenomena in a relativistic context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity (GR) and special relativity (SR)
  • Familiarity with periodic functions and their transformations
  • Knowledge of world lines and proper time in relativistic physics
  • Concept of the equivalence principle in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of periodicity in general relativity
  • Study the transformation properties of various periodic functions under Lorentz transformations
  • Investigate the concept of clock synchronization in special relativity
  • Review the "clock postulate" and its derivation from the postulates of special relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the implications of periodic phenomena in relativistic frameworks.

Eynstone
Messages
335
Reaction score
0
Is a phenomenon which is periodic in a frame A of reference also periodic in another frame B moving at a constant speed v with respect to A ?
I think general relativity will answer this in the negative. How about special relativity?
Consider a world line in A with the equation x=f(t) ; with f(t)= f(t+T) , T being the period. This won't transforms into x' = g(t') with a periodic g() as x,t depend on both x',t' . What form must f have in order to preserve periodicity?
(For instance f(t) =ct transforms well , but f(t) = sin wt doesn't.)
Since we determine time by periodic phenomena, I'd also like to ask how the arguments involving 'clock synchronization' in special relativity are to hold valid.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think periodicity of a world-line can sort of be defined in a coordinate-invariant way in GR. At least, there are certain properties of a periodically varying world-line that we can verify are periodic, in a coordinate-invariant way. For example, if an observer moves along the world-line with an accelerometer, he can verify that the reading on the accelerometer is a periodic function of proper time. I think this is weaker than the SR notion, however. E.g., it won't tell you anything useful about whether a geodesic is periodic, since the accelerometer will read zero the whole time. Maybe you can sense higher covariant derivatives, though. You can also sense, e.g., whether the variation of a curvature scalar with respect to proper time is periodic.

Eynstone said:
Since we determine time by periodic phenomena, I'd also like to ask how the arguments involving 'clock synchronization' in special relativity are to hold valid.

This is much easier. The clocks just have to be small enough so that, by the equivalence principle, SR is a good approximation. This is related to what people sometimes refer to as the "clock postulate," although it isn't really a postulate because it can be proved from the ordinary postulates of SR. Some references:

http://www.phys.uu.nl/igg/dieks/rotation.pdf (see p. 9)
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/clock.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K