Is PF 4.0 the Best Software Choice for Your Needs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phinds
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
PF 4.0 has received positive feedback for its impressive performance and effective configuration. Users appreciate the effort put into the software, noting significant improvements over previous versions. The ongoing development aims to enhance functionality further, ensuring optimal performance. The commitment to refining the software suggests a promising future for its users. Overall, PF 4.0 is viewed as a strong choice for those seeking reliable software solutions.
phinds
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
19,340
Reaction score
15,497
Greg, you know I don't hesitate to complain about stuff I don't like, but I'm also quick to praise what I do like and I got to tell you, I'm really impressed w/ 4.0

Your choice of this new software was excellent and all the work you put into configuring it (and getting whiners like me off your back) has really paid off.

Thank you very much.
 
  • Like
Likes DataGG, Greg Bernhardt, dlgoff and 2 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Lots left to do. Over the next few weeks we'll get this baby running like a well oiled machine!
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Back
Top