Is Principles of Physics by Halliday and Resnick Suitable for IPhO Preparation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the suitability of Halliday and Resnick's textbook "Principles of Physics" for preparation for the International Physics Olympiad (IPhO). Participants explore the book's relevance and effectiveness in addressing the types of problems encountered in the IPhO, as well as comparisons with other texts in the Halliday and Resnick series.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that "Principles of Physics" may not be specifically designed for IPhO-style problems, indicating a potential limitation for olympiad preparation.
  • One participant notes that Halliday and Resnick's textbooks have been used for many years in college physics courses, implying a level of credibility and longevity.
  • There is mention of three different Halliday and Resnick books, with a suggestion that the differences between them could impact their suitability for IPhO preparation.
  • A participant expresses a preference for "Physics" over "Fundamentals of Physics," citing that it contains harder problem sets, which may be more beneficial for olympiad training.
  • Another participant reflects on the historical significance and staying power of Halliday and Resnick's work, suggesting it has been influential in physics education.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the suitability of "Principles of Physics" for IPhO preparation. Multiple viewpoints exist regarding the effectiveness of different texts in the Halliday and Resnick series, and whether they meet the specific needs of olympiad preparation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference the evolution of the Halliday and Resnick textbooks over the years, indicating that newer editions may differ significantly from earlier ones. There is also mention of the need for a standard in teaching modern physics, which may influence the choice of textbook.

ubergewehr273
Messages
139
Reaction score
5
Is Resnick Halliday's textbook "Principles of physics" a good book ?
Is it useful for olympiads like IPhO (International Physics Olympiad) ?
It would be good if somebody could give a review on the book ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Halliday and Resnick is a good book used for many years for freshman level physics in college. It's not designed specifically to help you with the IPO style of problems.

However, the IPO site does have a questions and answers section that may help:

http://ipho.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/problems-and-solutions.html

Perhaps others can provide better discussion on the Halliday book as I last used it in the 1980's and has gone thru a lot of revisions and extensions over the years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gads ... it's been about 50 years since I took undergrad physics and we used Halliday and Resnick back then. Must be decent to have that kind of staying power.
 
Halliday and Resnick, Fundamentals of Physics came out at a time when a standard was needed for teaching modern physics to college students. It became the Gold standard. I liked it a lot when I had to study it even though our Physics dept chose another text for freshman use.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentals_of_Physics

Resnick taught at RPI during the time he co-wrote the book with Halliday and it was my impression that RPI got some royalties from the book though I have no reference for that. However, I am sure the publisher has made out very well.

Also now that Halliday and Resnick have passed on, Jearl Walker of Scientific American fame is the editor of the series which is still going strong.

That reminds me Christmas is coming maybe Santa will bring one along...

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1118230728/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K