Is R a Principal Ideal Domain (P.I.D) Given These Properties?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that an integral domain \( R \), which is a Noetherian Unique Factorization Domain (U.F.D.) and satisfies a specific property regarding the existence of elements \( u, v \in R \) such that \( au + bv = 1 \) for non-zero \( a, b \) with no common prime divisor, is a Principal Ideal Domain (P.I.D.). The participants conclude that for any ideal \( I = (a, b) \), the greatest common divisor \( d = \gcd(a, b) \) exists, leading to the relationship \( (a, b) = (d) \). This confirms that every ideal in \( R \) can be generated by a single element, thereby establishing that \( R \) is indeed a P.I.D.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral domains and their properties
  • Familiarity with Noetherian rings and Unique Factorization Domains (U.F.D.)
  • Knowledge of ideals and their generation in ring theory
  • Concept of greatest common divisor (gcd) in the context of rings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Noetherian rings and their implications on ideal generation
  • Learn about the structure and characteristics of Principal Ideal Domains (P.I.D.)
  • Explore the concept of Unique Factorization Domains (U.F.D.) and their relationship to P.I.D.s
  • Investigate the role of gcd in ring theory and its applications in proving ideal properties
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying abstract algebra, particularly those focusing on ring theory and ideal structures.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $R$ be an integral domain and a Noetherian U.F.D. with the following property:

for each couple $a,b\in R$ that are not both $0$, and that have no common prime divisor, there are elements $u,v\in R$ such that $au+bv=1$.

I want to show that $R$ is a P.I.D..
Since $R$ is Noetherian, we have that every ideal is finitely generated. Then every ideal is a finite product of irreducible elements of $R$.

How could we use the above property of $R$ to conclude that $R$ is a P.I.D. ? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose we have $I = (a,b)$.

Suppose $d = \gcd(a,b)$ (why does $d$ exist?).

Then $(a,b) = (ds,dt)$ where $\gcd(s,t) = 1$.

What can you say about $(d)$?
 
Deveno said:
Suppose we have $I = (a,b)$.

Suppose $d = \gcd(a,b)$ (why does $d$ exist?).

Then $(a,b) = (ds,dt)$ where $\gcd(s,t) = 1$.

What can you say about $(d)$?

Since $\gcd(s,t) = 1$ from the property of $R$ we have that $\exists u,v\in R$ such that $su+tv=1$.

Then $dsu+dtv=d \Rightarrow au+bv=d$.

We have that the elements of the ideal $(a,b)$ are of the form $ax+by$ where $x,y\in R$, right? (Wondering)

That means that elements of the ideal $(a,b)$ are the multiples of $d$, or not? ( $axk+byk=dk$ )
Therefore, $(a,b)=(d)$, right? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Since $\gcd(s,t) = 1$ from the property of $R$ we have that $\exists u,v\in R$ such that $su+tv=1$.

Then $dsu+dtv=d \Rightarrow au+bv=d$.

This shows that $(d) \subseteq (a,b)$

We have that the elements of the ideal $(a,b)$ are of the form $ax+by$ where $x,y\in R$, right? (Wondering)

Yes.

That means that elements of the ideal $(a,b)$ are the multiples of $d$, or not? ( $axk+byk=dk$ )

Not quite right-your conclusion is true though.

We have $a = ds$ and $b = dt$, so $ax + by = (ds)x + (dt)y = d(sx + ty)$, so $(a,b) \subseteq (d)$


Therefore, $(a,b)=(d)$, right? (Wondering)

Now...can you use this to show $R$ is a PID?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K