Is radiation pressure a thing?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that radiation pressure is a real phenomenon, where light beams transfer momentum, which can theoretically be utilized for propulsion. Participants highlight the importance of solar radiation pressure in calculating satellite orbits and mention applications such as solar sails and photon rockets. The conversation also touches on the mechanics of light as both particles and waves, emphasizing that both perspectives predict the same force due to electromagnetic waves. Additionally, the discussion references the use of radiation pressure in thermonuclear weapons, illustrating its powerful effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radiation pressure and its implications in physics.
  • Familiarity with solar sails and their applications in space propulsion.
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic theory, including wave and particle duality.
  • Basic mechanics of momentum conservation in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "solar sails" and their design principles for space exploration.
  • Study "photon rockets" and their potential for propulsion systems.
  • Explore the fundamentals of electromagnetic wave theory and the Poynting vector.
  • Investigate the mechanics behind thermonuclear weapons and their reliance on radiation pressure.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, and students interested in propulsion technologies, as well as anyone exploring the applications of radiation pressure in both theoretical and practical contexts.

24forChromium
Messages
155
Reaction score
7
I have seen the radiometer (mill in a bulb with differently coloured leaves) explained by thermodynamics, but also this:


where little particles are propelled by laser beam.

So, does light beam actually transfer or cause momentum in some way? If it does, is there any chance to make a propulsion engine with this? I would like to know more about it, explained in terms of simple-ish mechanics or photons' behaviours.
 
Science news on Phys.org
24forChromium said:
I have seen the radiometer (mill in a bulb with differently coloured leaves) explained by thermodynamics, but also this:


where little particles are propelled by laser beam.

So, does light beam actually transfer or cause momentum in some way?


Yes.
One has to account for solar radiation pressure for exact calculations of (Earth) satellite orbits.
Google "solar sail".
 
24forChromium said:
I have seen the radiometer (mill in a bulb with differently coloured leaves) explained by thermodynamics, but also this:


where little particles are propelled by laser beam.

So, does light beam actually transfer or cause momentum in some way?

tfr000 said:
Yes.
One has to account for solar radiation pressure for exact calculations of (Earth) satellite orbits.
Google "solar sail".
Momentum is conserved, right? That means if I shoot a beam of light in one direction, I should receive an impulse in the other direction, and no matter whether or not the beam of light lands on something. Would that be how radiation pressure can be used for a (very ineffective) kind of propulsion?
 
24forChromium said:
Momentum is conserved, right? That means if I shoot a beam of light in one direction, I should receive an impulse in the other direction, and no matter whether or not the beam of light lands on something. Would that be how radiation pressure can be used for a (very ineffective) kind of propulsion?
Ya know, I've never thought about it before... light for propulsion is always presented as an outside source fired at the craft.
 
Two ideas are getting confused here. There is such a thing as radiation pressure, but it's not what turns a Crookes radiometer. (Look and see which direction it turns)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrewD
Vanadium 50 said:
Two ideas are getting confused here. There is such a thing as radiation pressure, but it's not what turns a Crookes radiometer. (Look and see which direction it turns)
I never said it does.
I am asking if a flashlight is getting pushed backward when it's on.
 
24forChromium said:
I am asking if a flashlight is getting pushed backward when it's on.

It is. Calculating the magnitude of that reaction force is a good exercise that will go a long ways towards explaining why we don't notice this effect with flashlights. On the other hand, if something with very low mass emits sufficiently energetic electromagnetic quickly enough (for example, an atomic nucleus emitting gamma radiation) there will be a measurable recoil.
 
24forChromium said:
Momentum is conserved, right? That means if I shoot a beam of light in one direction, I should receive an impulse in the other direction, and no matter whether or not the beam of light lands on something. Would that be how radiation pressure can be used for a (very ineffective) kind of propulsion?

That's correct.

tfr000 said:
Ya know, I've never thought about it before... light for propulsion is always presented as an outside source fired at the craft.

I think it's an issue of fuel. Using a ground-based or space-based laser and a vehicle-based reflector, you can get a identical effect without having to use any power on the vehicle, which means you save tons of weight since you don't have to lug around as much fuel.
 
  • #10
24forChromium said:
<snip>So, does light beam actually transfer or cause momentum in some way? <snip>

Two more applications- optical trapping, and applying torque using polarized light on birefringent materials.

This is, AFAIK, the earliest demonstration:

http://journals.aps.org/pri/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevSeriesI.13.307

(I don't count Kepler's hypothesis to explain comet tails as a demonstration)
 
  • #11
lightarrow said:
The choice to post those links might suggest that light pressure can only be explained in terms of photons. In fact, classical em (wave) theory predicts precisely the same force for a given intensity of incident em waves. The only reference I can give is my old degree course book by Panovski and Philips but afaik, it is standard degree level EM theory.
 
  • #12
sophiecentaur said:
The choice to post those links might suggest that light pressure can only be explained in terms of photons. In fact, classical em (wave) theory predicts precisely the same force for a given intensity of incident em waves. The only reference I can give is my old degree course book by Panovski and Philips but afaik, it is standard degree level EM theory.
That light as electromagnetic wave has momentum has already been said in this thread by several poster and can be seen from the flux of Poyinting vector, force on a charge, etc. Actually I was looking for "laser" or similar "light" engine but I didn't find any, so I posted that, even because it was one of the OP choices: "I would like to know more about it, explained in terms of simple-ish mechanics or photons' behaviours."
I can only add a link to solar sails even if it's not exactly what I was looking for:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail

P.S. it's "Panofsky and Phillips", my friend! :smile:

--
lightarrow
 
Last edited:
  • #13
lightarrow said:
P.S. it's "Panofsky and Phillips", my friend!
Haha. My memory was working phonetically. The book is still in a box, after we moved house.

I must avoid posting after 'reading' threads on my phone. It gives me tunnel vision.
I guess that the 'mechanical' view of the phenomenon, involving particles is the more intuitive. One of the (not too frequent) times that photons actually seem really to help the understanding of an em phenomenon.
 
  • #14
I suppose that any discussion concerning the reality of radiation pressure wouldn’t really be complete without any mention of the most depressingly vivid demonstration of its power: it’s how the H-bomb works.

In a thermonuclear weapon, thermal radiation emitted by the walls of a container heated to millions of degrees is used to compress and heat a mixture of hydrogen isotopes until they undergo nuclear fusion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_implosion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_weapon

The H-bomb is a horrible contraption, but you have to marvel at the ingenuity of its design.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
21K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K