Is Reverse Engineering the Biontech-Pfizer Vaccine Similar to Programming?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neilparker62
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vaccine
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around an article that explores the reverse engineering of the source code for the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine, drawing an analogy between biological processes and computer programming. The article explains that DNA serves as the source code, which is transcribed into RNA to produce proteins. The vaccine aims to expose the immune system to harmless copies of the virus's protein coat, prompting an immune response without causing illness. Key steps include creating DNA from viral protein segments, compiling RNA, and delivering it into human cells using lipid nanoparticles. The immune system then generates a defense against these proteins. The conversation raises questions about the duration of immunity, the potential for individuals with varying immunity levels to infect others, and the severity of illness in vaccinated individuals who still contract the virus. Overall, the analogy with programming is noted as intriguing but not fully articulated in the article.
neilparker62
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
1,191
Reaction score
683
TL;DR Summary
Article on the 'source-code' of Biontech-Pfizer Vaccine
Biology news on Phys.org
Last edited:
The article is a bit disjointed, and the author refers the reader to other articles. The analogy is interesting but not well presented. At all.

What actually was done is several orders of magnitude more complex than it appears to be in the Readers Digest version below:

You need to know this stuff to start --

Basic background, program development, and the algorithm you want to implement:
Code:
1.  DNA is the source code for the working (compiled) runtime code, called RNA, to make proteins
2.  The wild virus is built from a protein coat and RNA inside the coat. You do not want them intact inside you.  
3. The immune system "learns" to react to the protein coat and send out an army of specialized killer cells and other proteins to render the virus particles useless.  This is the basis of vaccination and subsequent immunity.

Goal: Present the immune system with LARGE numbers of harmless exact copies of small parts of the virus protein coat. Let it run.
Code:
1. Create new DNA program from parts of the virus protein coat.
2. Some subroutines of that DNA are selected and compiled into RNA runtime (spike protein code)
3. For RNA to run it has to be fed to the operating system - a living human cell
4. RNA is packaged into LARGE numbers of lipid micro-balls which pass into the cell, unobstructed by the cell membrane
5. Cell prints a bunch of harmless proteins using RNA runtime from the lipid ball
6. Weird newly made proteins leave cell  to wander around in the blood and lymphatic tissues
7.  Immune systems reacts to kill off the foreign proteins.
8. Result: You do not get sick from the wild virus freely provided by unvaccinated people around you.

Some things we need data for, going forward.
Code:
1. How long does immunity last?
2. There are levels of immunity, so can people with lower levels of immunity infect other people?
3. The few people (~5%) who got sick (~94% or so should be just fine)  after inoculation, was disease severity reduced?

Some answers are beginning to trickle in...
 
  • Like
Likes neilparker62 and pinball1970
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top