Pfizer/Moderna covid vaccine research papers

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This discussion revolves around the research papers related to the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, focusing on their efficacy, safety profiles, and the implications of dosing regimens. Participants explore various aspects of the studies, including statistical analyses, side effects, and the rationale behind the two-dose recommendation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight the peer-reviewed Pfizer vaccine study and discuss its findings, including the effectiveness and side effects observed in different age groups.
  • Others note the importance of the second dose, citing that effectiveness after the first dose ranges from 30% to 68%.
  • A participant questions how the effectiveness numbers were derived, suggesting that the cohort size may have influenced the results.
  • There is a discussion about the visual representation of vaccine efficacy and the potential for a one-dose regimen, with some participants expressing curiosity about future studies on this topic.
  • Some participants reflect on the FDA's decision-making process regarding dosing, suggesting that the two-dose regimen was chosen to ensure efficacy based on safety data from earlier trials.
  • One participant mentions a paper discussing the appropriate time between doses, linking it to earlier tests and dosage considerations.
  • There is a note that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines utilize different technology compared to other vaccines, which may affect their dosing and efficacy profiles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the efficacy and safety of the vaccines, the rationale for the two-dose regimen, and the interpretation of data from the studies. No consensus is reached on the necessity or effectiveness of a one-dose regimen versus two doses.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations are noted regarding the cohort size and the statistical analysis methods used in the studies, as well as the dependence on earlier trials for dose selection. Specific assumptions about the data and its interpretation remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to researchers, healthcare professionals, and individuals seeking to understand the nuances of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety data.

  • #31
Ygggdrasil said:
The Moderna Phase 3 trial results have been published in the NEJM:

Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389
Excellent! Thanks for posting this!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Laroxe

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
10K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K