LogicalAcid
- 137
- 0
In other words, the whole point of the reaction is not to stabilize? And then, how does entropy have anything to do with a reaction?
The discussion centers on the relationship between stability and chemical reactions, emphasizing that the products of a chemical reaction are typically more thermodynamically stable than the reactants. It highlights the role of universal entropy, which is always increasing, while local entropy can decrease in certain processes, such as the condensation of water. The conversation also mentions specific reactions driven by entropy, such as the explosive reaction of triacetone triperoxide (TATP), which transitions from solid to gas without being thermodynamically favored.
PREREQUISITESChemistry students, chemical engineers, and researchers interested in thermodynamics and reaction mechanisms.
pzona said:I'm not sure I understand what you mean, but...
In general, the product of a chemical reaction is more stable (thermodynamically) than the starting material. Also remember that UNIVERSAL entropy is what is constantly increasing. Local entropy can decrease (condensing water, for example). But like I said, I'm not sure what exactly you're asking. If you clarify maybe I can help more.