Is Supersymmetry required by String theory?

In summary: But I would say that, even then, you would need to include some form of supersymmetry in order to make the theory consistent.
  • #1
TheHeraclitus
14
1
TL;DR Summary
Supersymmetry is often mentioned together with String theory, but do all String theories require it?
From what I understood Supersymmetry means there are more particles than we currently know about and they are predicted by (some/all, I do not know) versions of String theory.
Is it so important to String theory or can it work without SUSY?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Susy is, as far as we know, required for the particle spectrum to be consistent. Without susy you get e.g. tachyonic particles which are hard to interpret as physical particles. So yes.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
  • #3
haushofer said:
Susy is, as far as we know, required for the particle spectrum to be consistent. Without susy you get e.g. tachyonic particles which are hard to interpret as physical particles. So yes.
Non-perturbative formulation of bosonic string-field theory reinterprets tachyonic state as an unstable state, very much like tachyonic Higgs field before symmetry breaking is reinterpreted as an unstable state. By a process of tachyon condenzation the unstable state (local maximum of the potential) settles down into a stable state (local minimum of the potential) and excitations around the stable state are no longer tachyonic. So I would say no.

But we still need susy in string theory because that's the only known way (as fas as I am aware) to incorporate fermions into string theory, and we need fermions because they are observed in nature.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I have seen multiple knowledgeable theoretical physicists state authoritatively that supersymmetry is necessary as a low energy approximation of string theory.

To some extent, however, it boils down to definitions.

If you use a fairly strict definition of string theory or M-theory, then this is probably correct.

If you use a loose definition of string theory that, for example, borrows heavily from its mathematical methods without embracing the entire discipline's canonical form for it, perhaps you could get a stringy theory that doesn't have supersymmetry as a low energy approximation.
 

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
197
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
28
Views
3K
Back
Top