Is T_k a Subspace for Polynomial Coefficients Summing to k?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on whether the set T_k, consisting of all polynomials of degree 3 or lower with coefficients summing to k, forms a subspace of P_3(x). Participants conclude that T_k is not closed under scalar multiplication, thus it does not satisfy the criteria for being a subspace. Additionally, the direct sum property involving subspaces V_1, V_2, and V_3 is also deemed false, with examples provided to illustrate the lack of intersection among the subspaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial spaces, specifically P_3(x)
  • Knowledge of vector space properties, including closure under scalar multiplication
  • Familiarity with direct sums in linear algebra
  • Basic concepts of linear independence and intersection of subspaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of polynomial spaces, focusing on P_3(x) and its subspaces
  • Research vector space axioms, particularly closure properties
  • Explore direct sums and their implications in linear algebra
  • Examine examples of linear independence in polynomial sets
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, particularly those studying polynomial spaces and vector space theory. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of subspaces and direct sums in the context of polynomials.

supercali
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
A) let T_k be all polynomials with degree 3 or under such that k is their coefficients sum.
so we can say that exist at least 2 values of k for them T_k is the sub vector space of P_3(x)?
B) this question is about direct sum: Let [tex]V_1,V_2,V_3[/tex] be subvector spaces of V if [tex]V_1 \cap V_2={0}[/tex] and [tex]V_1 \cap V_3={0}[/tex] than [tex]V_1 \cap (V_2+V_3)={0}[/tex]


Homework Equations



A) is this true? am i right? look under for my answer

The Attempt at a Solution



A)i think this statement is false for example for k=2,4 we have T_k polynomials but T_k is not close under scalar multipication...is this right?

B)i infact don't think the statement is true but i couldn't find an exaple to support it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For A), k=2 or 4 don't work, you are right. But what if k=0? For B), yes, it's false. Take the space of linear polynomials P_1(x). Let V1 be all multiples of (1+x), V2 be all multiples of 1 and V3 be all multiples of x.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K