Is the analytic properties of Fermionic self energy well known?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analytic properties of Fermionic self energy, particularly focusing on its behavior as a function of the Matsubara frequency, wn. Participants explore the implications of these properties in calculations and the design of self energy ansatz for analytic continuation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that for arbitrary Fermionic self energy, \Sigma(i wn) with wn=(2n+1)pi T, the real part is always an even function of wn while the imaginary part is always an odd function of wn.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the lack of responses and inquires if there are any new findings related to the topic.
  • A different participant suggests that the analytic properties of self energy are well known or easily derived, questioning why these properties are not enforced in calculations when designing self energy ansatz for analytic continuation.
  • Additionally, a participant specifies that \sigma(iw)=\sigma(-iw)*, indicating a relationship between the self energy at positive and negative frequencies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple viewpoints, with some participants asserting that the properties are well established while others express curiosity about their application in calculations. No consensus is reached regarding the enforcement of these properties in practice.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not fully explore the implications of their claims, and there is a lack of detailed discussion on the assumptions underlying the analytic properties mentioned.

bsmile
Messages
46
Reaction score
2
For arbitrary Fermionic self energy, \Sigma(i wn) with wn=(2n+1)pi T, its real part is always an even function of wn while its imaginary part is always an odd function of wn.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
 
Sorry, I think the issues about this analytic property of self energy is well known, or easily derived. I was curious why people would not enforce it in their calculation when say they design self energy ansatz for possible analytic continuation.
 
Or, more specifically, \sigma(iw)=\sigma(-iw)*
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K