Is the Closure of a Totally Bounded Set Also Totally Bounded?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sazanda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of totally bounded sets within the context of complex analysis. The original poster (OP) is exploring the relationship between a set being precompact and its closure being compact.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the definitions of precompactness and total boundedness, with some suggesting that the OP may be conflating the two concepts. There are attempts to clarify the definitions and explore the implications of these properties in the context of the closure of sets.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of definitions and properties related to totally bounded sets. Some participants have provided guidance on proving that the closure of a totally bounded set is also totally bounded, while others are seeking clarification on the definitions and the appropriate approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the OP has not covered the concept of total boundedness in their studies, leading to discussions about relying on definitions of precompactness instead. There is also mention of using the Heine-Borel theorem in the context of the discussion.

sazanda
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let S be a subset of C. Prove that S is precompact if and only
if S(closure) is compact.

Homework Equations



I have already showed if S(closure) compact, then S is precompact
how can I show if S is precompact, then S(closure) is compact?

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your definition ofS being precompact? The one I knew is that the closure of S is compact.
 
Bacle said:
What is your definition ofS being precompact? The one I knew is that the closure of S is compact.

I think the OP means totally bounded. I've seen this terminology used before...

Anyway, you are working in \mathbb{C}. So try to prove that the closure of a totally bounded set is (totally) bounded. Then use Heine-Borel.
 
Definition:
A set S is precompact if every ε>0 then S can be covered by finitely many discs of radius ε .
 
micromass said:
I think the OP means totally bounded. I've seen this terminology used before...

Anyway, you are working in \mathbb{C}. So try to prove that the closure of a totally bounded set is (totally) bounded. Then use Heine-Borel.

We didn't cover totally boundedness. I think we should use definition of precompactess.
 
Sazanda:
The definition you gave is the same as that of totally-bounded. I mean, totally.
 
totally bounded

micromass said:
I think the OP means totally bounded. I've seen this terminology used before...

Anyway, you are working in \mathbb{C}. So try to prove that the closure of a totally bounded set is (totally) bounded. Then use Heine-Borel.

how Can I show that the closure of a totally bounded set is (totally) bounded?

solution Tried:

Assume S is totally bounded. then for very ε>0 there are finitely many discs (O=Union of finitely many discs) that covers S let x be a limit points of S that is in S closure. but not in S.
hence x is in O (how can I show this?)
So x is in O for all x in S closure.
Hence S closure is totally bounded.

Am I on the right track?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K