Is the CMK matrix a constant for all experimental energies?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the constancy of the CKM matrix across various experimental energies. It is established that the CKM matrix provides ratios between weak decay rates, such as n → peν and Λ → peν, without an energy range dependency. According to the Standard Model, these parameters do exhibit energy dependence, as referenced in section 4.7 of the paper available at http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9912358. However, the potential running of these parameters may be too subtle to detect, as indicated by the lack of mention in the 2011 Particle Data Group review at http://pdg.lbl.gov/2011/reviews/rpp2011-rev-ckm-matrix.pdf.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the CKM matrix and its role in particle physics
  • Familiarity with weak decay processes
  • Knowledge of the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Ability to interpret scientific literature, particularly in high-energy physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of energy dependence in the CKM matrix
  • Explore the findings in section 4.7 of the paper at http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9912358
  • Examine the 2011 Particle Data Group review on the CKM matrix at http://pdg.lbl.gov/2011/reviews/rpp2011-rev-ckm-matrix.pdf
  • Investigate experimental methods for detecting subtle variations in weak decay rates
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in high-energy physics, and students studying the Standard Model and weak interactions will benefit from this discussion.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,231
Reaction score
419
Is the CMK matrix a constant for all experimental energies that we can presently explore?

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The CKM matrix gives ratios between weak decay rates, for example n → peν vs Λ → peν. There is no energy range involved.
 
In the standard model these parameters do run with energy, e.g. see section 4.7 of http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9912358.

If such running has been observed it ought to be in http://pdg.lbl.gov/2011/reviews/rpp2011-rev-ckm-matrix.pdf" but I don't see it mentioned. It may just be too small to be seen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K