Is the Commutator of a Cross Product a Vector Operator?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 7K views
teroenza
Messages
190
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Given that [tex]\vec{V}[/tex] and [tex]\vec{W}[/tex] are vector operators, show that [tex]\vec{V}\times \vec{W}[/tex] is also a vector operator.

2. The attempt at a solution
The only way I know how to do this is by showing that the commutator with the angular momentum vector operator ([itex]\vec{J}[/itex]) is zero. Namely that [itex][\vec{V}\times \vec{W} , \vec{J}] = 0[/itex]. I want to start the problem by expressing the commutator as I would usually do by writing [A,B] = AB - BA, but I don't know exactly which type of multiplication to use here. Intuition tells me the dot product, but I want to be sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
teroenza said:

Homework Statement


Given that [tex]\vec{V}[/tex] and [tex]\vec{W}[/tex] are vector operators, show that [tex]\vec{V}\times \vec{W}[/tex] is also a vector operator.

2. The attempt at a solution
The only way I know how to do this is by showing that the commutator with the angular momentum vector operator ([itex]\vec{J}[/itex]) is zero. Namely that [itex][\vec{V}\times \vec{W} , \vec{J}] = 0[/itex]. I want to start the problem by expressing the commutator as I would usually do by writing [A,B] = AB - BA, but I don't know exactly which type of multiplication to use here. Intuition tells me the dot product, but I want to be sure.

No, it's not the dot-product. The usual meaning of [itex][A, \vec{J}][/itex] is that the result is a composite object (a tensor) with three components:

[itex][A, J_x][/itex], [itex][A, J_y][/itex], [itex][A, J_z][/itex]

If [itex]A[/itex] is itself a vector, then you get 9 components:

[itex][\vec{A}, \vec{J}] = T[/itex]

where [itex]T_{ij} = [A_i, J_j][/itex] and where [itex]i[/itex] and [itex]j[/itex] are either [itex]x[/itex], [itex]y[/itex], or [itex]z[/itex].

As to your claim that for a vector operator, [itex][\vec{A}, \vec{J}] = 0[/itex], you should try an example with the momentum operator, [itex]\vec{p}[/itex]. Try [itex][p_x, J_y][/itex].
 
Thank you. That is a mistake above. I meant that the only way I know of to show that it is a vector operator, is to show that [itex] [\vec{V}\times \vec{W} , \vec{J}] \neq 0[/itex]. I was able to show that this is the case. This means it is not a scalar operator, but I am not sure if this is sufficient to show that it is a vector operator. It does mean that the rotation generator operator U won't commute with V x W.

Edit: I believe now that the condition to show that it is a vector operator, is to show that: [tex] [(\vec{V}\times \vec{W})_{i}, \vec{J}_{j}] = i \hbar \epsilon_{ijk} (\vec{V}\times \vec{W})_{k}[/tex]
 
Last edited: