MHB Is the Convergence of a Real Number Series Determined by Positive Integers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the convergence of a series of real numbers, specifically addressing the condition for absolute convergence. It states that a series converges absolutely if, for every epsilon greater than zero, there exists a positive integer N such that the sum of any indices greater than or equal to N is less than epsilon. This highlights the relationship between the series' convergence and the behavior of its terms as the index increases. The problem remains unanswered by participants, with a solution provided by the original poster. The topic emphasizes the mathematical principles governing series convergence.
Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Let $\sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty a_n$ be a series of real numbers. Show that $\sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty a_n$ converges absolutely if and only if to each $\epsilon > 0$, there corresponds a positive integer $N = N(\epsilon)$ such that if $n_1,\ldots, n_m$ are indices no less than $N$, then $|a_{n_1} + \cdots + a_{n_m}| < \epsilon$.
-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No one answered this week's problem. You can find my solution below.
Suppose $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty a_n$ converges absolutely. Given $\epsilon > 0$, there exists a positive integer $N$ such that $\sum_{n = p}^q |a_n| < \epsilon$ whenever $q \ge p \ge N$. Let $n_1,\ldots, n_k$ be a finite set of indices such that $n_i \ge N$ for all $i$. Without loss of generality, assume $n_1 < \cdots < n_k$. Then

$$|a_{n_1} + \cdots + a_{n_k}| \le |a_{n_1}| + \cdots + |a_{n_k}| \le \sum_{n = n_1}^{n_k} |a_n| < \epsilon.$$

To prove the converse, we argue by contaposition. Suppose that $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty |a_n|$ diverges. Then there exists $\epsilon > 0$ such that, given $N \in \Bbb Z^{+}$, there exists $s > r \ge N$ such that $\sum_{n = r}^s |a_n|\ge \epsilon$. Let $n_1,\ldots, n_m, n_{m+1},\ldots, n_k$ be the indices in $\{r,r+1,\ldots, s\}$ such that $a_n \ge 0$ for $n = n_1,\ldots, n_m$ and $a_n \le 0$ for $n = n_{m+1},\ldots, n_k$. Since $$|a_{n_1} + \cdots + a_{n_m}| + |a_{n_{m+1}} + \cdots + a_{n_k}| = \sum_{n = r}^s |a_i| \ge \epsilon,$$ either $|a_{n_1} + \cdots + a_{n_m}| \ge \epsilon/2$ or $|a_{n_{m+1}} + \cdots + a_{n_k}| \ge \epsilon/2$. Hence, the contrapositive holds.
 
Last edited: