Is the Converse of a Continuous Function on Product Spaces Also Continuous?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmjlt88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
jmjlt88
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
Let f: A -> B and g: C -> D be continuous functions.

Define h: A x C -> B x D by the equation

h(a,c)=(f(a),g(c)).​

Show h is continuous.


A few weeks ago I completed this exercise. Now, I am working on a problem that would be almost too easy if the converse of the above claim were true. I had trouble trying to construct a counterexample; so I tried to prove it.

Suppose h is continous. Let U be open in B. Then U x D is open in B x D, and by our assumption, h-1(U x D) is open in A x C. Since h-1(U x D) = f-1(U) x g-1(D), f-1(U) is open and f is continuous.

Does f-1(U) x g-1(D) being open in the product space imply f-1(U) is open in A?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.

Forgive my naivety, but how come the exercise isn't presented as an "if and only if" statement?

Perhaps I should examine these problems more closely. I originally completed this problem rather quickly; I then moved on without a second thought about if the converse is true. I should pay more attention.
 
jmjlt88 said:
Yes.

Forgive my naivety, but how come the exercise isn't presented as an "if and only if" statement?

Perhaps I should examine these problems more closely. I originally completed this problem rather quickly; I then moved on without a second thought about if the converse is true. I should pay more attention.

The converse seems much less interesting, so I can understand why it is not an exercise. In either case, thinking about the converse is always a good practice.