Is the Converse of a Continuous Function on Product Spaces Also Continuous?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmjlt88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of a function defined on product spaces, specifically examining whether the converse of a continuous function on product spaces is also continuous. The original poster reflects on a previous exercise involving continuous functions and their properties in relation to open sets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to construct a counterexample to the converse of the continuity claim and questions whether the openness of the preimage implies the openness of a specific set in the context of product spaces. Other participants inquire about the nature of projections as open maps and express curiosity about the framing of the exercise.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of continuity in product spaces and questioning the structure of the exercise. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of projections, but there is no explicit consensus on the converse's validity.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of continuity and openness in the context of product spaces, with some expressing uncertainty about the framing of the exercise as an "if and only if" statement.

jmjlt88
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
Let f: A -> B and g: C -> D be continuous functions.

Define h: A x C -> B x D by the equation

h(a,c)=(f(a),g(c)).​

Show h is continuous.


A few weeks ago I completed this exercise. Now, I am working on a problem that would be almost too easy if the converse of the above claim were true. I had trouble trying to construct a counterexample; so I tried to prove it.

Suppose h is continous. Let U be open in B. Then U x D is open in B x D, and by our assumption, h-1(U x D) is open in A x C. Since h-1(U x D) = f-1(U) x g-1(D), f-1(U) is open and f is continuous.

Does f-1(U) x g-1(D) being open in the product space imply f-1(U) is open in A?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are projections open maps?
 
Yes.

Forgive my naivety, but how come the exercise isn't presented as an "if and only if" statement?

Perhaps I should examine these problems more closely. I originally completed this problem rather quickly; I then moved on without a second thought about if the converse is true. I should pay more attention.
 
jmjlt88 said:
Yes.

Forgive my naivety, but how come the exercise isn't presented as an "if and only if" statement?

Perhaps I should examine these problems more closely. I originally completed this problem rather quickly; I then moved on without a second thought about if the converse is true. I should pay more attention.

The converse seems much less interesting, so I can understand why it is not an exercise. In either case, thinking about the converse is always a good practice.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K