Is the coupling constant just Gz for all these interactions?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
venomxx
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Just a quick question, the Z can couple to leptons and there antiLeptons and quarks and there corresponding antiquark. Is the coupling constant just Gz for all these interactions? Or is it Gz.Sin(z) for some and not for others?

Iv seen different notation and am wondering why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
venomxx said:

Homework Statement


Just a quick question, the Z can couple to leptons and there antiLeptons and quarks and there corresponding antiquark. Is the coupling constant just Gz for all these interactions? Or is it Gz.Sin(z) for some and not for others?

Iv seen different notation and am wondering why?

What is the solution of the photon?

ie

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/Standard_deviation_diagram.svg

In SR?

ie

[tex]\bar{x}=x[/tex]

and

[tex]\bar{z}=z[/tex]

The coupling constant is constant. so [tex]G_z=Gz.Sin(z)[/tex] if there are no CPT violations.

Charge Parity Time (CPT)

Thus CPT symmetry.

And thus QFT:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_field_theory
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cheers for the response :)

So for a Z --> e-e+ and Z--> qq" the coupling constants would be the same? Gz = gz*Sin(z)? I know that it changes for the weak depending on if its interacting with quarks or leptons, I am still unsure of why the difference?

Also out of curiosity... i thought it can't be constant because of the 'running of the coupling constants' idea?
 
venomxx said:
Cheers for the response :)

So for a Z --> e-e+ and Z--> qq" the coupling constants would be the same? Gz = gz*Sin(z)? I know that it changes for the weak depending on if its interacting with quarks or leptons, I am still unsure of why the difference?

Also out of curiosity... i thought it can't be constant because of the 'running of the coupling constants' idea?

Exactly weak has CPT violations inherent in it thus The Nobel prize for electro/weak theory.
 
Schrödinger's Dog said:
Exactly weak has CPT violations inherent in it thus The Nobel prize for electro/weak theory.

Electroweak theory has CP violations. No theory has CPT violations.
 
Subsequently i have found it to be a little different then mentioned above:

(z --> uu') has a coupling constant GzCos(z)
(z --> dd') has a coupling constant GzCos(z)

(z --> cc') has a coupling constant GzSin(z)
(z --> ss') has a coupling constant GzSin(z)

Can i confirm that this is correct? Also i am still unsure for leptons, am i to assume its just Gz like for W bosons?

Cheers