Is the Cube of matrix associative?

Click For Summary
Matrix multiplication is associative, meaning the order of multiplication does not affect the final result, as confirmed by multiple participants in the discussion. The original poster initially believed they were obtaining different matrices when cubing a matrix, but later realized that the expressions were equivalent despite appearing different due to transposition. The confusion arose from the properties of transposes and inverses, which reverse the order of multiplication. Ultimately, the poster confirmed that their matrices were indeed the same, resolving their initial concern. Understanding these properties is crucial for correctly handling matrix operations in problems like finding the cube of the expectation value in quantum mechanics.
TheMercury79
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
I was wondering the same thing as the poster of this original thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cubing-a-matrix.451979/

I have a matrix that needs to be cubed, so which order should I use:
[A]^3 = [A]^2[A] or [A][A]^2 ?
Relevant Equations
The two people that answered both say the order doesn't matter since
matrix multiplication is associative:

(A*A)*A=A*(A*A)
But I actually don't get the same matrix. What I get is the transpose of the other when I change the order

i.e when I do [A]^2[A] I get the transpose of [A][A]^2 and vice versa

What I'm trying to do is find the cube of the expectation value of x in the harmonic oscillator in matrix form.
We're supposed to use direct matrix multiplication (using ladder operators is in part b of the problem).
I seem to have got the correct matrix elements for x^2, but for x^3 the order of the multiplication does seem
to matter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheMercury79 said:
Homework Statement:: I was wondering the same thing as the poster of this original thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cubing-a-matrix.451979/

I have a matrix that needs to be cubed, so which order should I use:
[A]^3 = [A]^2[A] or [A][A]^2 ?
Relevant Equations:: The two people that answered both say the order doesn't matter since
matrix multiplication is associative:

(A*A)*A=A*(A*A)

But I actually don't get the same matrix.
Then you have made a mistake somewhere. Matrix multiplication is indeed associative and thus the order irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Likes TheMercury79
fresh_42 said:
Then you have made a mistake somewhere. Matrix multiplication is indeed associative and thus the order irrelevant.

Thanks. It turned out they are the same. I just ended up with different expressions on the transposes.
e.g (3/2)*sqrt(1/2) was transposed with sqrt(1/2)*(1+sqrt(1/2)), but these are equal so there was no problem
 
Transposing changes the order: ##(A\cdot B)^\tau=B^\tau \cdot A^\tau##, same does inversion: ##(A\cdot B)^{-1}=B^{-1} \cdot A^{-1}##.
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...