Is the current density operator derived from fundamental considerations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The current density operator is defined by the equation -\frac{\delta H}{\delta A}, as discussed in the context of many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics. This relationship is not merely a definition; it can be derived from fundamental principles, specifically through the Euler-Lagrange equations and the Legendre transform. The derivation involves the Lagrangian formulation where the vector potential \(\vec A\) plays a crucial role in defining the Hamiltonian and subsequently the current operator. The discussion references the work of Bruus and Flensberg, emphasizing the foundational aspects of this relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian dynamics
  • Knowledge of many-body quantum theory
  • Basic concepts of vector potentials in electromagnetism
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Euler-Lagrange equations in detail
  • Explore the Legendre transform in classical mechanics
  • Read "Many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics" by Bruus and Flensberg
  • Investigate the role of vector potentials in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in condensed matter physics, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the foundational aspects of quantum theory and its applications in many-body systems.

Paul159
Messages
15
Reaction score
4
Hello,

I found this article. In equation (1) the authors wrote that the current operator is given by : ## - \frac{\delta H}{\delta A} ##.
I just would like to know if this relation is a just definition or if it can be derived from more fundamentals considerations ?

Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quoting from "Many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics" by Bruus and Flensberg:
"In analytical mechanics ##\vec A## enters through the Lagrangian: ##L=\frac{1}{2}mv^2-V+q \vec v \cdot \vec A## since by the Euler-Lagrange equations yields the Lorentz force. But ##\vec p=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \vec v}=m\vec v + q\vec A##, and via a Legendre transform we get ##H(r,p)=\vec p \cdot \vec v - L(r,v)=\frac{1}{2}mv^2+V=\frac{1}{2m}(\vec p - q\vec A)^2 +V##. Considering infinitesimal variation ##\delta \vec A## we get ##\delta H = H(\vec A +\delta \vec A)-H(\vec A)=-q\vec v \cdot \delta \vec A##".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Paul159 and dRic2
Ok I see thanks !
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K