Is the damage from a collision affected by the speed of the vehicles involved?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of vehicle speed on collision damage, specifically comparing a stationary vehicle with one traveling at 10 mph to two vehicles traveling at 60 mph and 50 mph. It is established that higher speeds result in greater collision forces due to increased momentum and energy transfer. The mechanics of engine torque and gear ratios are also highlighted, indicating that a vehicle in lower gear at lower speeds may experience different momentum effects compared to higher speeds in overdrive. The conversation concludes that the relative frame of reference, such as the stationary cement mixer, plays a crucial role in understanding the dynamics of the collision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly momentum and energy transfer
  • Familiarity with vehicle dynamics, including torque and gear ratios
  • Knowledge of collision mechanics and the conservation of momentum
  • Awareness of the effects of speed on vehicle performance and safety
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of momentum and energy transfer in collisions
  • Study vehicle dynamics, focusing on torque and gear ratios
  • Explore the effects of speed on collision outcomes in automotive safety studies
  • Investigate real-world case studies of vehicle collisions at varying speeds
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, safety analysts, and anyone interested in understanding the physics of vehicle collisions and their implications for safety and design.

Matteh
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, new user here, just had to ask this question though to settle a debate! :)

What I'm saying is that for a collision between two vehicles with one stationary and the other traveling at 10mph the damage will be less than if one vehicle was traveling at 50mph and the other at 60mph - same 10mph difference.

My main belief for this is that at 60mph, the engine is driving the car forwards with more force w.r.t speed as it has to overcome wind resistance. If the two vehicles were to collide, the engine would keep pushing the vehicle forwards, into the other creating a 'bigger' crash. if it were at 10mph, the engine would be doing less work compared to the speed and as such would slow down easier.

In this case, a hatchback (at 60mph) went into a cement mixer (at 50mph) and the damage looks more than the claimed 10mph difference

Any thoughts on this? my view obviously seems logical to me, but everyone else dissagrees!

its odd, because you have to take into account the fact that the car is propelled and the drag forces associated with the system
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess it depends on the collision - is it a head on collision?
 
oh sorry, the car (travelling at 60mph) went into the back of the cement mixer (travelling at 50mph)
 
At lower speed and in a lower gear, the torque multiplier is much higher than in a higher gear (probably overdrive) cruising at 60mph. The momentum effect of the engine will also be multiplied by the gearing. So the effect of the engine's momentum may be higher at the lower speed than at the higher speed.
 
You could also say that the flywheel would have more momentum as it would be turning much faster, this would increase the engines torque
 
Cement mixer and hatchback vs... two sedans? Because the cement mixer is obviously (in terms of conservation of momentum) going to force the hatchback to slow down more, meaning it's going to take more damage

Ignoring that, more energy is required to slow down the 60 mph car to, say, 55, than for a 10 mph car to slow down to say, 5 mph (because it's v2)
 
Office_Shredder said:
Cement mixer and hatchback vs... two sedans? Because the cement mixer is obviously (in terms of conservation of momentum) going to force the hatchback to slow down more, meaning it's going to take more damage

Ignoring that, more energy is required to slow down the 60 mph car to, say, 55, than for a 10 mph car to slow down to say, 5 mph (because it's v2)

but what about if you think of it with the cement truck as the inertial frame of reference? the car is then only doing 10mph
 
Matteh said:
flywheel would have more momentum as it would be turning much faster, this would increase the engines torque
Assume that top gear is 3 times as tall as 1st gear (typical, 1st gear at around 3.00, top gear at 1.00) Then the flywheel is turning twice as fast at 60mph in top gear than at 10mph in 1st gear, but in 1st gear, the torque is multiplied by 3, so there's more momentum effect in 1st gear at 10mph.

More energy is required to slow down the car from 60 mph car to 50, than from 10mph to 0.
True if the tires were doing the slowing, but in this case it's the big truck. The energy's frame of reference should be the relative to the point of application, and in both of these situations, the point of application is the big truck, so the energy relative to the truck is the same.

Say the car was going 10mph forwards on a flat bed truck moving at 50mph. The amount of work it takes to slow from 10mph to 0 on the truck is the same as if the car were slowing from 10mph to 0 on pavement, even though the car slows from 60mph to 50mph relative to the pavement when it's on the flat bed truck.

Similarly, even though the Earth surface is moving at 900mph to the East at specific latitudes, the work done to slow from 10mph to 0mph is virtually the same if the car is headed east or west. Not to mention that the Earth is orbiting the Sun at around 67,000mph, and the Sun orbits the Milky Way at around 560,000mph.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
84K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K