amb1989
- 23
- 0
Is this a u-sub? I went through and got 1/(2x)^2 but I am not sure if that is correct.
The discussion revolves around the differentiation and integration of the function (ln x)^2, specifically whether a u-substitution is appropriate and how to correctly apply integration by parts.
Some participants have offered guidance on the application of integration by parts and the need to revisit the derivative of (ln x)^2. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with no explicit consensus reached.
There is uncertainty regarding the correct application of the integration by parts formula and the derivative of (ln x)^2, with participants suggesting different approaches to clarify these points.
danago said:You can use a substitution, but the answer is not quite 1/(2x)^2.
How did you arrive at that answer?
danago said:Hmm I am not really sure how you ended up xln(x)-(integral sign)(1)(1/(2x)^2).
I would choose the same parts as you did, i.e. u = (ln x)^2 and dv = 1, but I am not sure you applied the formula correctly.
[tex]\int u dv =uv - \int v du[/tex]
Is that what you are using?