Is the Derivative of Speed the Magnitude of Acceleration?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PFuser1232
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Speed Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The first time derivative of velocity is acceleration, but the first time derivative of speed does not yield the magnitude of acceleration in general cases. For example, if velocity is defined as v(t) = t^2, then acceleration a(t) = 2t, but the magnitude of acceleration is given by 2|t|. The mathematical distinction is clear: d|f(x)|/dx does not equal |df(x)/dx|, confirming that differentiating speed does not produce the magnitude of acceleration. This conclusion holds true except in specific cases, such as uniform circular motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Familiarity with vector components in physics
  • Knowledge of one-dimensional motion concepts
  • Basic grasp of mathematical functions and piecewise definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between velocity and acceleration in uniform circular motion
  • Learn about vector calculus and its application in physics
  • Explore piecewise functions and their derivatives in depth
  • Investigate the conditions under which d|v|/dt equals |dv/dt|
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mathematicians, and anyone interested in the nuances of motion and calculus will benefit from this discussion.

PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
The first time derivative of velocity is acceleration. Can we then conclude that the first time derivative of speed is the magnitude of acceleration? In the following example I will consider a one dimensional case, for the sake of argument. Suppose the velocity v of a particle as a function of time t is given by v(t) = t^2. The acceleration, a, as a function of t is therefore given by a(t) = 2t. And so the magnitude of acceleration (the absolute value, since we are dealing with a one dimensional case as I have previously stated) is a "piece-wise defined function of t", namely 2|t|. That's observation A.
Now, let's go back to velocity. Since |v(t)| = v(t), we can then conclude that the derivative of speed as a function of time is given by d/dt(|v(t)|) = 2t; which, technically speaking, is not the same as |a(t)|. So am I right in my conclusion that differentiating speed does not yield the magnitude of acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MohammedRady97 said:
The first time derivative of velocity is acceleration. Can we then conclude that the first time derivative of speed is the magnitude of acceleration?
No. See uniform circular motion.

MohammedRady97 said:
In the following example I will consider a one dimensional case, for the sake of argument.
That's a special case then. Not true in general.
 
A.T. said:
No. See uniform circular motion.


That's a special case then. Not true in general.

But the example I gave helped make the point that differentiating speed w.r.t. time does not yield the magnitude of acceleration. Or do you mean that I am wrong in this conclusion?
 
To sum it all up:
Mathematically, d|f(x)|/dx \neq |df(x)/dx|. Ergo the first time derivative of speed is not the magnitude of acceleration, am I right?
 
MohammedRady97 said:
Or do you mean that I am wrong in this conclusion?
No, you are right.
 
dv/dt in general does not equal the magnitude of acceleration.
generally v is a vector with several components and the derivative is also a vector with several components. I don't readily know if d|v|/dt = |dv/dt| is true or false, but I would assume not.
There might be some special cases where it is true.
 
Aren't we certain that d|v|/dt =/= |dv/dt|?

|v(t)| = v(t)
and the derivative of v(t) is a(t)
Then the derivative of |v(t)| would also be a(t)
a(t) is not |a(t)|
Therefore, the derivative of |v(t)| is not |a(t)|.

So we know they aren't the same. Correct me if I have any mistakes.


That seems to be the problem,
I think MohammadRady97 is spot on. The magnitude of the acceleration is |df(x)/dx| but you, OP, tried to do d|f(x)|/dx, which as MohammadRady said (and I've shown explicitly above) are not the same thing.
 
Wittyname6 said:
Aren't we certain that d|v|/dt =/= |dv/dt|?

|v(t)| = v(t)
and the derivative of v(t) is a(t)
Then the derivative of |v(t)| would also be a(t)
a(t) is not |a(t)|
Therefore, the derivative of |v(t)| is not |a(t)|.

So we know they aren't the same. Correct me if I have any mistakes.


That seems to be the problem,
I think MohammadRady97 is spot on. The magnitude of the acceleration is |df(x)/dx| but you, OP, tried to do d|f(x)|/dx, which as MohammadRady said (and I've shown explicitly above) are not the same thing.

Exactly. The time derivative of speed is, in general, by no means related to the magnitude of acceleration. It just so happens that in some cases they're both equal. (A mathematical coincidence, if you will.)
 
I got bored. I think this is overkill. You're all welcome.

Wittyname6 said:
|v(t)| = v(t)
and the derivative of v(t) is a(t)
Then the derivative of |v(t)| would also be a(t)
a(t) is not |a(t)|
Therefore, the derivative of |v(t)| is not |a(t)|.
This logic doesn't sit well with me. Let's just do the math

Say \vec{v}(t)=f(t)\hat{\textbf{i}}+g(t)\hat{\textbf{j}}

|v(t)|=\sqrt{[f(t)]^2+[g(t)]^2}

then

\vec{a}(t) = \frac{dv}{dt}(t)=\frac{df}{dt}\hat{\textbf{i}}+\frac{dg}{dt}\hat{ \textbf{ j}}

where

|a(t)|=|\frac{dv}{dt}(t)|=\sqrt{\left(\frac{df}{dt}\right)^2+\left( \frac{dg}{dt} \right)^2}

and

\frac{d|v|}{dt}(t)=\frac{1}{2}\left( [f(t)]^2+[g(t)]^2\right)^{-1/2}\left[2f(t)\frac{df}{dt}+2g(t)\frac{dg}{dt}\right]


If you try and solve |a(t)| = \frac{d|v|}{dt}

you find that this is only true if

\left(f(t)\frac{dg}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(g(t)\frac{df}{dt}\right)^2 = f(t)g(t)(\frac{df}{dt})(\frac{dg}{dt})

or

\frac{f(t)}{g(t)}\frac{dg/dt}{df/dt}+\frac{g(t)}{f(t)}\frac{df/dt}{dg/dt} = 1


Therefore, the time derivative of |v(t)| is not |a(t)| unless that condition is met. Through a little guessing, the only solutions I've found are when either f or g = 0, or f and g are constants.


I hope this clears everything up.
 
  • #10
elegysix said:
I got bored. I think this is overkill. You're all welcome.


This logic doesn't sit well with me. Let's just do the math

Say \vec{v}(t)=f(t)\hat{\textbf{i}}+g(t)\hat{\textbf{j}}

|v(t)|=\sqrt{[f(t)]^2+[g(t)]^2}

then

\vec{a}(t) = \frac{dv}{dt}(t)=\frac{df}{dt}\hat{\textbf{i}}+\frac{dg}{dt}\hat{ \textbf{ j}}

where

|a(t)|=|\frac{dv}{dt}(t)|=\sqrt{\left(\frac{df}{dt}\right)^2+\left( \frac{dg}{dt} \right)^2}

and

\frac{d|v|}{dt}(t)=\frac{1}{2}\left( [f(t)]^2+[g(t)]^2\right)^{-1/2}\left[2f(t)\frac{df}{dt}+2g(t)\frac{dg}{dt}\right]


If you try and solve |a(t)| = \frac{d|v|}{dt}

you find that this is only true if

\left(f(t)\frac{dg}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(g(t)\frac{df}{dt}\right)^2 = f(t)g(t)(\frac{df}{dt})(\frac{dg}{dt})

or

\frac{f(t)}{g(t)}\frac{dg/dt}{df/dt}+\frac{g(t)}{f(t)}\frac{df/dt}{dg/dt} = 1


Therefore, the time derivative of |v(t)| is not |a(t)| unless that condition is met. Through a little guessing, the only solutions I've found are when either f or g = 0, or f and g are constants.


I hope this clears everything up.

Yeah. But just to be clear, aren't f and g the respective x- and y-components of velocity?
 
  • #11
yes, f(t) and g(t) are the x and y components of velocity. I was lazy some and used f and g, but they are the same thing. Recall that the derivative of speed you were asking about is \frac{d}{dt}\left(|v(t)|\right), and the magnitude of acceleration is |dv/dt|, so that's why the answer is in components of the velocity.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K