For arbitrary natural numbers a and b, I don't think the direct sum of Z_a and Z_b (considered as additive groups) is isomorphic to Z_ab. But I think if p and q are distinct primes, the direct sum of Z_p^m and Z_q^n is always isomorphic to Z_(p^m * q^n). Am I right? I've been freely using these facts in abstract algebra, but I wanted to make sure they're correct.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank You in Advance.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Is the direct sum of cyclic p-groups a cyclic group?

Loading...

Similar Threads - direct cyclic groups | Date |
---|---|

I Entries in a direction cosine matrix as derivatives | Feb 20, 2017 |

I Prove that V is the internal direct sum of two subspaces | Feb 6, 2017 |

Direct Product of Cyclic Groups | Nov 6, 2014 |

Finding which direct sum of cyclic groups Z*n is isomorphic to | Feb 14, 2013 |

Belian group A that is the direct sum of cyclic groups | May 11, 2004 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**