I Is the eccentricity of the lunar orbit constant?

AI Thread Summary
The eccentricity of the lunar orbit is not constant; it varies between 0.044 and 0.067 over the course of half a year, with an average value of 0.0549. This variation is influenced by the tidal forces exerted by the Sun on the Earth-Moon system, causing the eccentricity to be maximal when the Sun aligns with the major axis of the Moon's orbit. The graph in the Wikipedia article may appear confusing due to the elliptical orbit's rotation, which occurs every 8.8479 years, leading to different visual representations over time. The elliptical orbit described by Kepler's laws is affected by additional forces, such as those from the Sun, which complicate its predictability. Understanding these dynamics clarifies the apparent discrepancies in lunar orbit eccentricity.
Orthoceras
Messages
125
Reaction score
48
TL;DR Summary
Confusion about a graph in wikipedia
The wikipedia article on Lunar distance contains a confusing graph. The graph seems to suggest that the eccentricity of the lunar orbit is maximal in january and ~july, and minimal in april and ~october. I think the eccentricity should be constant. Is wikipedia right or wrong, or is there some trivial confusion?

Moon-Earth_distance,_Moon_phases.gif

Wikipedia legends: The Moon's distance from the Earth in 2014 ...
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Orthoceras said:
I think the eccentricity should be constant.
No, the eccentricity varies between 0.044 and 0.067 during the course of half a year; the value e = 0.0549 is just an average. The cause is the tidal force of the sun on the earth-moon system. When the direction to the sun is aligned with the major axis, the eccentricity is biggest, and smallest when aligned with the minor axis. Since the ellipse is not fixed in space, but rotates once every 8.8479 years, the confusing graph will look different from year to year.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes FactChecker, Orthoceras, Orodruin and 1 other person
To build upon that: The elliptical orbit of the Kepler potential is only an exact solution for the Kepler potential. Add any lower order effects (such as the tidal forces from the Sun mentioned above) and you will break that. The only question is by how much.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top