I Is the eccentricity of the lunar orbit constant?

Click For Summary
The eccentricity of the lunar orbit is not constant; it varies between 0.044 and 0.067 over the course of half a year, with an average value of 0.0549. This variation is influenced by the tidal forces exerted by the Sun on the Earth-Moon system, causing the eccentricity to be maximal when the Sun aligns with the major axis of the Moon's orbit. The graph in the Wikipedia article may appear confusing due to the elliptical orbit's rotation, which occurs every 8.8479 years, leading to different visual representations over time. The elliptical orbit described by Kepler's laws is affected by additional forces, such as those from the Sun, which complicate its predictability. Understanding these dynamics clarifies the apparent discrepancies in lunar orbit eccentricity.
Orthoceras
Messages
125
Reaction score
48
TL;DR
Confusion about a graph in wikipedia
The wikipedia article on Lunar distance contains a confusing graph. The graph seems to suggest that the eccentricity of the lunar orbit is maximal in january and ~july, and minimal in april and ~october. I think the eccentricity should be constant. Is wikipedia right or wrong, or is there some trivial confusion?

Moon-Earth_distance,_Moon_phases.gif

Wikipedia legends: The Moon's distance from the Earth in 2014 ...
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Orthoceras said:
I think the eccentricity should be constant.
No, the eccentricity varies between 0.044 and 0.067 during the course of half a year; the value e = 0.0549 is just an average. The cause is the tidal force of the sun on the earth-moon system. When the direction to the sun is aligned with the major axis, the eccentricity is biggest, and smallest when aligned with the minor axis. Since the ellipse is not fixed in space, but rotates once every 8.8479 years, the confusing graph will look different from year to year.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes FactChecker, Orthoceras, Orodruin and 1 other person
To build upon that: The elliptical orbit of the Kepler potential is only an exact solution for the Kepler potential. Add any lower order effects (such as the tidal forces from the Sun mentioned above) and you will break that. The only question is by how much.
 
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
18K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
13K