Is the Function f(x) = (x+2)^-1 Bounded on the Open Interval (-2,2)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded Function
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the function f(x) = (x+2)^-1 and its boundedness on the open interval (-2,2). The original poster questions whether there exists a constant K such that |f(x)| < K for all x in the specified interval, noting the function approaches positive infinity as x approaches -2 from the right.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants suggest proving that the function is not bounded rather than attempting to find a K. Others propose using derivatives to analyze the function's behavior for maximum or minimum points, questioning the existence of such points to support the boundedness argument.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different approaches to understanding the boundedness of the function. Some guidance has been offered regarding proving unboundedness and the use of derivatives, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method or conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the function's behavior near the endpoint of the interval and the definitions of boundedness in the context of the open interval. There is an acknowledgment of the function's definition and behavior within the interval, particularly as it approaches -2.

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, I would like to know if the function f(x) = (x+2)^-1 is bounded on the open interval (-2,2)? The interval doesn't include the point x = -2 but I'm not sure if I can say that there is a K>=0 such that |f(x)| < K for all x in (-2,2).

The function is defined everywhere in that interval but still approaches positive infinity as x tends to x = - 2 from above so I'm not sure what to conclude here. Any help would be great thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Instead of trying to find such a K, i.e. instead of trying to proove that f is bounded, try to prove that it is not bounded. (And it obviously is not bounded since, as you noted yourself, it is intuitively evident that the function goes to infinity as x gets nearer and nearer to -2)

A function is not bounded on its domain if given any number M, you can find an element 'a' of the domain such that f(a)>M.

So somewhat like in the epsilon-delta proofs, if you can find a relation a(M) that associated to every M a number 'a' in (-2,2) such that f(a)>M, then you will have proven the unboundedness of f.
 
Last edited:
Do you know anything about finding the maximum of a function using derivatives?

If yes, find the derivative of the function and try to find a maximum/minimum point. You shouldn't be able to find one, which means the function itself isn't bounded in the open interval.

Otherwise, assume there exists some K that does satisfy your equation. Now, find an x that does not satisfy the equation, which is a contradiction so that such a K can not exist.

Therefore, simply solve |f(x)|<K, where K is a constant and be sure to pick an x that is in the open interval (-2,2).

Note: The answer for x should be dependent on K.
 
Ok thanks. I probably made it more complicated than it was.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K