Is the Given Vector the General Solution of the Nonhomogeneous Linear System?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on verifying that the vector c_1(1,1)t + c_2(1,3)t^{-1} is the general solution of the corresponding homogeneous system for the nonhomogeneous linear system defined by the equation tx' = A x + B, where A = |2 -1| and B = |1 - t^2|, |2t|. Participants emphasize the importance of demonstrating that both eigenvectors satisfy the equation and are independent, rather than solving the system outright. The solution requires confirming the validity of the proposed general solution through substitution and independence checks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically eigenvalues and eigenvectors.
  • Familiarity with nonhomogeneous linear systems and their solutions.
  • Knowledge of differential equations, particularly in the context of systems of equations.
  • Proficiency in matrix operations and transformations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of verifying solutions for nonhomogeneous linear systems.
  • Learn about the properties of eigenvectors and eigenvalues in linear algebra.
  • Explore techniques for solving differential equations involving matrices.
  • Investigate polynomial solutions for particular solutions in nonhomogeneous systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra and differential equations, as well as educators looking for examples of verifying solutions in linear systems.

simmonj7
Messages
65
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Verify that the given vector is the general solution of the corresponding homogeneous system and then solve the nonhomogenous system. Assume that t>0.

tx' =
|2 -1|x + |1- t^2|
|3 -2| |2t |

General solution:
x =
c1| 1|t + c2| 1|t^-1
| 1| |3|

This won't show up correctly but the first eigen vector is (1,1) and the second is (1,3)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


So I have been solving non homogeneous linear systems all night with no problems however when I got to this problem I got stumped because there is a t in front of x'. I solved for the eigen values and eigen vectors and the eigen vectors match what they have but I have the general solution by solving it without acknowledging the t in front of x'. I thought that maybe I could just divide my general solution I got by t and then I would have the same answer, however that doesn't work because the solution provided by the problem doesn't have any e^t's in it. So I am not quite sure on what is going on exactly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi simmonj7! :smile:

(use the CODE tag for matrices … it's not what it's there for, but it does work! :wink:)

for the homogeous solution, i suspect you're meant to assume a solution of the form tn

for the particular solution, if it wasn't a matrix, you'd try a polynomial P(t) …

so try a vector of two polynomials, (P(t),Q(t)) :wink:
 
The problem is
t\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y\end{bmatrix}'= \begin{bmatrix}2 & -1 \\ 3 & -2\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y\end{bmatrix}+ \begin{bmatrix} 1- t^2 \\ 2t\end{bmatrix}

and you want to show that
c_1\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 1\end{bmatrix}t+ c_2\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 3\end{bmatrix}t^{-1}
is the general solution.

Both you and tiny-tim talk about "solving" the system but you are not asked to solve it! You are only asked to verify that the given solution works and that is a far easier problem.
(Which would be easier, to solve x^5- 3x^4+ 4x^2- 3x+ 1= 0 or to show that x= 1 is a solution?)

To show that the given function is the general solution, you need to use the fact that the general solution of a linear equation is a general linear combination of two independent solutions.

So you need to show three things:
1) That
\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 1\end{bmatrix}t= \begin{bmatrix}t \\ t\end{bmatrix}
satisfies the equation by putting it and its derivative into the equation.

2) That
\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 3\end{bmatrix}t^{-1}= \begin{bmatrix}t^{-1} \\ 3t^{-1}\end{bmatrix}
satisfies the equation by putting it and its derivative into the equation.

3) That those two functions are independent (that one is not a multiple of the other).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K