Is the Placement of Branch Cuts in ln(-s^2-iε) Physically Significant?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physical significance of branch cuts in the expression ln(-s² - iε), where s² and ε are positive values. It highlights that while the conventional branch cut for ln() is on the negative real axis, moving it to the positive real axis does not alter the physical results, as ln(-s² - iε) equals ln(-s² + iε). The choice of branch, influenced by the iε term, is crucial for determining the correct value of the logarithm, emphasizing that the physical interpretation relies on selecting the appropriate branch for consistent results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex logarithms and branch cuts
  • Familiarity with Mandelstam variables in particle physics
  • Knowledge of loop diagrams in quantum field theory
  • Basic principles of analytic continuation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of branch cuts in complex analysis
  • Explore the role of Mandelstam variables in scattering theory
  • Investigate the concept of analytic continuation in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the physical interpretations of different branches of logarithmic functions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those working in quantum field theory, mathematicians interested in complex analysis, and anyone studying the implications of branch cuts in physical expressions.

RedX
Messages
963
Reaction score
3
In the expression [tex]ln(-s^2-i\epsilon)[/tex], [tex]s^2[/tex] and [tex]\epsilon[/tex] are positive (this expression can result from for example a loop diagram where [tex]s^2[/tex] is a Mandelstam variable). In mathematics, the branch cut of ln() is usually taken to be the negative real axis, so that the value above the negative axis differs from the value below the negative axis by [tex]2\pi i[/tex].

But shouldn't the physical result be independent of where you place the branch cut? If you place it on the positive real axis, then [tex]ln(-s^2-i\epsilon)[/tex] has the same value as [tex]ln(-s^2+i\epsilon)[/tex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RedX said:
In the expression [tex]ln(-s^2-i\epsilon)[/tex], [tex]s^2[/tex] and [tex]\epsilon[/tex] are positive (this expression can result from for example a loop diagram where [tex]s^2[/tex] is a Mandelstam variable). In mathematics, the branch cut of ln() is usually taken to be the negative real axis, so that the value above the negative axis differs from the value below the negative axis by [tex]2\pi i[/tex].

But shouldn't the physical result be independent of where you place the branch cut? If you place it on the positive real axis, then [tex]ln(-s^2-i\epsilon)[/tex] has the same value as [tex]ln(-s^2+i\epsilon)[/tex].

The [itex]i\varepsilon[/itex] part is telling you which branch to use. Yes, you can move the branch cut to the real axis, but you still have to choose the correct branch (i.e., do you have [itex]\ln e = 1[/itex] or [itex]\ln e = 1 + 2\pi i[/itex], etc.).
 
Ben Niehoff said:
The [itex]i\varepsilon[/itex] part is telling you which branch to use. Yes, you can move the branch cut to the real axis, but you still have to choose the correct branch (i.e., do you have [itex]\ln e = 1[/itex] or [itex]\ln e = 1 + 2\pi i[/itex], etc.).

How are you supposed to know which branch of the function to choose? Physically, does it matter if argument is [tex]\theta[/tex] or [tex]\theta+2\pi[/tex]? Separating a function into branches seems to me a mathematical convenience, to get the function to be single-valued.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K