Is the Right-Hand Rule Applied Correctly in Determining Magnetic Forces?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the correct application of the Right-Hand Rule for determining magnetic forces in a homework problem. The user expresses confusion about their answers, particularly for segments C, D, and F, where they incorrectly identified the force directions. Clarifications indicate that the thumb represents the force direction, while fingers should point in the current's direction and curl towards the magnetic field. It is emphasized that when the current aligns with the magnetic field, the force is zero, confirming the user's mistakes in segments C, D, and F. The conversation concludes with a detailed verification of the calculations for segments A, B, and C, reinforcing the correct application of the Right-Hand Rule.
LaneRendell
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


lvcRBWH.png


Homework Equations


The Right-Hand Rule

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having some issues with the right-hand rule to find the direction of magnetic force, and I'm doing a homework problem.
The answers I got are (letters are vector directions):

A: -j
B: i
C: j
D: i
E:-i
F:-i

Am I doing this right? If not could someone explain a good way to do the right hand rule or where I'm making the mistake. As I understand it, you point your uncurled palm in the direction of the current and then curl your fingers in the direction of the magnetic field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Actually, all your fingers except the thumb must point in the direction of the current and then you curl them in the direction of the magnetic field. The thumb will indicate the direction of the force once your fingers are curled. If you are already pointing in the direction of the magnetic field and have no need to curl your fingers, then the force and direction are 0. In segment C, your fingers point to the magnetic field direction (z), therefore you got that one wrong, the answer is \vec{0}. Verify segment D and segment F. The rest are okay.

I can help you to verify algebraically. Maybe someone with more experience can help with the right hand rule since I too have a little trouble with it. Algebraically we can check that at segments: C, D, and F; you got it wrong. The rest are correct (A, B, E). Here is an explanation, but you can skip to the verification examples I wrote if you find the explanation too verbose and learn better by looking at examples.

We know that: \vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}

For the purpose of this exercise we ignore q.
We will take \vec{v} to mean the direction vector of our current. Since we are working in a unit cube we will always assume the magnitude of \vec{v} to be 1.
\vec{B} = (0i + 0j + 1k), the direction vector of our magnetic field in this specific exercise.

Now before I give you examples of verification, we note that since we have a cross product of the direction of the current and the direction of the magnetic field, any current moving in the same direction as the magnetic field will experience 0 force. Or mathematically speaking: \left | \vec{F}\right | = q\left |\vec{v}\right | \left | sin(\theta) \right | \left | \vec{B}\right |

If you look at that, when the current moves in the same direction as the magnetic field, \theta = 0, which makes the whole equation 0.

Verification Examples:
I will make examples of verification for A, B, and C so you can get the hang of it:

\vec{F_{A}} = (1i + 0j + 0k) \times (0i + 0j + 1k)

<br /> \begin{vmatrix}<br /> i &amp; j &amp; k \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp;1<br /> \end{vmatrix}<br /> =<br /> \begin{vmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp;1<br /> \end{vmatrix}i -<br /> \begin{vmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp;1<br /> \end{vmatrix}j +<br /> \begin{vmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp;0<br /> \end{vmatrix}k<br />

= (0*1 - 0*0)i - (1*1 - 0*0)j + (1*0 - 0*0)k
= 0i - 1j + 0k
\vec{F_{A}} = -j

\vec{F_{B}} = (0i + 1j - 1k) \times (0i + 0j + 1k)

<br /> \begin{vmatrix}<br /> i &amp; j &amp; k \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; -1 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp;1<br /> \end{vmatrix}<br /> =<br /> \begin{vmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; -1 \\<br /> 0 &amp;1<br /> \end{vmatrix}i -<br /> \begin{vmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; -1\\<br /> 0 &amp;1<br /> \end{vmatrix}j +<br /> \begin{vmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> 0 &amp;0<br /> \end{vmatrix}k<br />

=(1 * 1 - -1*0)i - (0*1 - -1*0)j + (0*0 - 1*0)k
= 1i - 0j + 0k
\vec{F_{B}} = i

\vec{F_{C}} = (0i + 0j + 1k) \times (0i + 0j + 1k)

<br /> \begin{vmatrix}<br /> i &amp; j &amp; k \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp;1<br /> \end{vmatrix}<br /> =<br /> \begin{vmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 0 &amp;1<br /> \end{vmatrix}i -<br /> \begin{vmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 1\\<br /> 0 &amp;1<br /> \end{vmatrix}j +<br /> \begin{vmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 0\\<br /> 0 &amp;0<br /> \end{vmatrix}k<br />

=(0*1 -1*0)i - (0*1 -1*0)j + (0*0 - 0*0)k
= 0i -0j + 0k
\vec{F_{C}} = \vec{0}

As you will expect, \vec{F_{C}} = \vec{F_{F}} = \vec{0}, because both of currents in those segments move in the same direction as the magnetic field.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K