Is the Set Linearly Independant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bugatti79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linearly Set
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the linear independence of a set of vectors in a real vector space, specifically the set \{b_1, b_2, b_3, b_1+b_4, b_2+b_4\}, given that \{b_1, b_2, b_3, b_4\} is linearly independent.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of linear independence and the conditions under which a set of vectors can be dependent. There are attempts to rearrange equations to analyze the linear combinations of the vectors. Some participants question the validity of their methods and reasoning regarding linear independence.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions about linear independence and the necessary conditions for a set of vectors to be dependent. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to show that all coefficients in the linear combination must equal zero to establish independence.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the relationship between the number of vectors and the dimension of the space, as well as confusion regarding the application of the Wronskian in this context, which is clarified by participants.

bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Let V be a real vector space and [tex]{b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4}[/tex] a linearly independent set of vectors in V
Is the set [tex]\left \{ b_1,b_2,b_3,b_1+b_4,b_2+b_4 \right \}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\alpha_1b_1+\alpha_2b_2+\alpha_3b_3+\alpha_4\left \{ b_1+b_4 \right \}+\alpha_5\left \{ b_2+b_4 \right \} =0[/tex]

Rearranging

[tex]b_1(\alpha_1+\alpha_4)+b_2(\alpha_2+\alpha_5)+b_3(\alpha_3)+b_4(\alpha_4+\alpha_5)=0[/tex]
Hence it is NOT linearly independent since the scalars are all not 0...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there,

It's been a while since I've done this, and I'm sure that my methods are not sound but I think I have a pretty good idea of the answer here.

A set of vectors are linearly independent if you cannot write any on of the vectors in terms of any finite number of other vectors in the set. I can see right now that b2 + b4 = b2 + (b1 + b4) - b1

in other words if b1 = V1, b2 = V2...b2 +b4 = V5 then V5 = V2 + v4 - V1

Does that make sense to you?
 
And I think that if a set of vectors are linearly independent they span the space correct? And it seems illogical that a set of 4 vectors can span 5 space :)
 
ok, that makes sense. Thanks :-)
 
bugatti79 said:

Homework Statement


Let V be a real vector space and [tex]{b_1,b_2,b_3,b_4}[/tex] a linearly independent set of vectors in V
Is the set [tex]\left \{ b_1,b_2,b_3,b_1+b_4,b_2+b_4 \right \}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\alpha_1b_1+\alpha_2b_2+\alpha_3b_3+\alpha_4\left \{ b_1+b_4 \right \}+\alpha_5\left \{ b_2+b_4 \right \} =0[/tex]

Rearranging

[tex]b_1(\alpha_1+\alpha_4)+b_2(\alpha_2+\alpha_5)+b_3(\alpha_3)+b_4(\alpha_4+\alpha_5)=0[/tex]
Hence it is NOT linearly independent since the scalars are all not 0...?
You're not quite finished. You need to show that all of the alpha's are necessarily equal to 0 if you want to show those vectors are linearly independent. Since the b's are independent, you know that equation can only be satisfied if
\begin{align*}
\alpha_1+\alpha_4 &= 0 \\
\alpha_2+\alpha_5&= 0 \\
\alpha_3&= 0 \\
\alpha_4+\alpha_5&= 0
\end{align*}If the only solution to this system is [itex]\alpha_i = 0[/itex] for i=1, 2, 3, 4, 5, the vectors are linearly independent. In this case, you'll find there are non-zero solutions to the system, so they are dependent.
dacruick said:
And I think that if a set of vectors are linearly independent they span the space correct? And it seems illogical that a set of 4 vectors can span 5 space :)
You're thinking of a basis, which consists of linearly independent vectors that span the space. Any set of vectors, independent or not, will span some space or subspace.

You're close though. There's a theorem that says if you have more vectors than the dimension of the space they're in, they have to be dependent. If you've already covered this theorem, you can use it as well to solve this problem.
 
vela said:
You're not quite finished. You need to show that all of the alpha's are necessarily equal to 0 if you want to show those vectors are linearly independent. Since the b's are independent, you know that equation can only be satisfied if
\begin{align*}
\alpha_1+\alpha_4 &= 0 \\
\alpha_2+\alpha_5&= 0 \\
\alpha_3&= 0 \\
\alpha_4+\alpha_5&= 0
\end{align*}If the only solution to this system is [itex]\alpha_i = 0[/itex] for i=1, 2, 3, 4, 5, the vectors are linearly independent. In this case, you'll find there are non-zero solutions to the system, so they are dependent.

Ok, do I use the Wronskian to find if the determinant is 0. if it is 0 then the vectors are linearly dependent? Thanks
 
No, the Wronskian has nothing to do with this problem. I think you simply mean you want to find the determinant of the coefficient matrix. If it's 0, the system is dependent. It's probably less work just to go ahead and solve the system of equations though.
 
but can one not use the Wonrskian in this problem? Anyhow, will I solve this using gaussian elimination?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K