Is the Sup Metric Used to Minimize Writing d_infinity in C[0,1]?

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter coverband
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 3K views
coverband
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
in a question if you're asked to CONSIDER C[0,1] with the sup metric, does this mean that for the appearance of d(g,f) throughout this question the MAXIMUM distance between g and f (i.e. d_infinity) is to be considered?

Its like a way of saving writing d_infinity all the time if you just state at the start "consider with the sup metric" and have d alone throughout ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They denote the metric (conventionally) by d and they mean that d is the sup metric (which, if more than one metric is relevant, is conventionally denoted [itex]d_\infty[/itex]). So
[tex]d(f, g) = \sup_{x \in [0, 1]} |f(x) - g(x)|[/tex]
(assuming the metric on [0, 1] is just the Euclidean one :smile:)

If that's what you meant, you're right.
 
So "consider C[0,1] with the sup metric..." means everytime you see "d" throughout the question, this means "d_infinity"
 
This means that whenever one refers to the metric of [itex]C[0,1][/itex], be it by the symbol [itex]d[/itex] (provided this symbol is used in this context to denote the metric of [itex]C[0,1][/itex]) or otherwise, one means the sup metric, which is usually denoted [itex]d_\infty[/itex].