Programs Is the The National Academy of Future Scientists legit?

AI Thread Summary
The National Academy of Future Scientists and Technologists has raised concerns about its legitimacy, with many individuals questioning its authenticity and finding mixed responses online. Despite notable names like Buzz Aldrin and John C. Mather listed as mentors, the organization lacks a comprehensive online presence, including a Wikipedia entry. It appears to function as a seminar series aimed at engaging students with industry leaders, but it has been described more like a three-day summer camp focused on networking rather than providing substantial educational benefits. Founded recently, the organization has unclear details regarding its location and representation, leading to skepticism about its value, particularly concerning college applications. Participants are advised to consider the financial implications and potential benefits carefully before committing.
GiantSheeps
Messages
83
Reaction score
7
The National Academy of Future Scientists and Technologists

That's the full title of the organization, does anyone know if it is a legitimate organization? I got really excited when I saw, but then when I looked it up on the internet I found a lot of people asking if it was legitimate and there were mixed replies. I couldn't even find a wikipedia article for this. It says Buzz Aldrin, David Wineland, John C. Mather, Cherry Murray, and Stuart Schmill are "mentors". It would be great if this was real, but I'm afraid it might be a scam. Does anyone know what the deal is with this group? Any info would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like a seminar series where they get interested students to attend to listen to various industry leaders to talk about the future.

These things are very common for engineering professionals and scientists. You attend and listen to new research discoveries in your field.

In this case, it will be more like a three day summer camp where you will be more excited to talk with other like minded students discussing what the speakers talked about and you will have spent a lot of money for that privilege. It could be a lot of fun but is it really worth it. Your parents migh think it will help you get into a better school but it's three days of talks nothing really concrete.

That's just my two cents though.
 
  • Like
Likes GiantSheeps
I never heard of it before, so I did a Google search and turned up probably the same things you did. It was founded just last November, by a guy who's launched some other variations on this theme. Their web site doesn't even yet have a list of schools and cities represented.

On one page they say "The Congress will be held in one of America’s science and technology meccas, Boston, Massachusetts [...]" but on the "accept" page the FAQ says it will be at UMass Lowell. Lowell is not Boston!

I'd call it a gamble, and treat it like a summer camp sort of thing. If the program and other activities look interesting, and if your parents can afford it without taking money away from other priorities, you might consider it. I doubt it would provide a significant advantage on college applications.
 
  • Like
Likes GiantSheeps
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lazarus-20160129-column.html
GiantSheeps said:
The National Academy of Future Scientists and Technologists

That's the full title of the organization, does anyone know if it is a legitimate organization? I got really excited when I saw, but then when I looked it up on the internet I found a lot of people asking if it was legitimate and there were mixed replies. I couldn't even find a wikipedia article for this. It says Buzz Aldrin, David Wineland, John C. Mather, Cherry Murray, and Stuart Schmill are "mentors". It would be great if this was real, but I'm afraid it might be a scam. Does anyone know what the deal is with this group? Any info would be greatly appreciated.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lazarus-20160129-column.html
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top