Is the trampoline analogy an accurate representation of space-time curvature?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fabric Space-time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the use of the trampoline analogy to represent space-time curvature in the context of general relativity. Participants explore the implications of this analogy, its limitations, and how it relates to the actual structure of the solar system and the nature of gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the trampoline analogy, which depicts the sun creating a dent in a flat plane, is a simplification that may mislead people into thinking of gravity as a downward force in space.
  • Others argue that the curvature of space-time is not confined to three spatial dimensions, suggesting that the solar system is perceived as a plane rather than a curved structure.
  • A participant questions the absence of time in the traditional illustrations and whether these diagrams effectively communicate the forces at play in the solar system.
  • Some contributions emphasize the need to visualize curvature in multiple directions rather than just downward, proposing that the behavior of space-time should be considered in terms of attractive forces between masses.
  • There is a mention of the challenges in illustrating four-dimensional concepts in a three-dimensional world, highlighting the complexity of representing space-time curvature accurately.
  • A participant expresses skepticism about the usefulness of the analogy, suggesting that it may lead to misconceptions about the nature of space and gravity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views regarding the effectiveness and accuracy of the trampoline analogy. There is no consensus on whether it is a helpful representation or a misleading simplification, indicating ongoing debate and differing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the limitations of the analogy, including its potential to create misconceptions about directional forces in space and the challenges of visualizing four-dimensional space-time accurately. The discussion remains open-ended regarding the implications of these representations.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
Textbooks usually illustrate space and our solar system with the planets lying on a sheet where the heaviest object at the centre is the sun. Other planets surround it in orbits. The attraction towards the sun is due to the dent created by the sun. This is a result of GR. If this theory is correct than when we observe the solar system, it should look something like in the diagram provided where the ring of planets is above the sun. Is this what happens? Could someone give a link of an actual aerial view of all the planets and the sun?
 

Attachments

  • spacefabric.GIF
    spacefabric.GIF
    1.2 KB · Views: 760
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The curvature is not in the 3 spatial dimensions, so we just see the solar system as a plane.
 
Why do they illustarte it as if it is in 3 spatial dimensions? Is the dimension of time missing? Is the diagram a way of illustrating how forces and centripetal acceleartion are communicated and manifested?
 
The illustration is an "embedding diagram", look for more info on this. : )
 
4d on paper would be really hard to illustrate in a 3d world.

You have to remember that we consider time the 4th dimension graphed.
 
As noted above, the diagram/model you are talking about is a helpful way to visualize what is going on in 4-D spacetime. Now you just need to visualize the curvature in all directions rather than just 'down'. :)

The 'curvature' is analogous to the sun creating a dent in the flat plane, but that's not what we actually see in 3D space...the sun and planets are essentially in the same plane.

Perhaps rather than getting stuck on the word 'curvature' we could consider the 'behavior' of spacetime instead (an attractive force between masses rather than a physical slope shown in the drawing).
 
The bowling-ball analogy strikes again. ;)
 
pivoxa15 said:
Could someone give a link of an actual aerial view of all the planets and the sun?
I'm afriad that no man-made craft has gone that far, at an angle to the plane of the solar system, to get such a photo. I don't think it'll look any different than the usual diagrams.
 
Phobos said:
As noted above, the diagram/model you are talking about is a helpful way to visualize what is going on in 4-D spacetime. Now you just need to visualize the curvature in all directions rather than just 'down'. :)

The 'curvature' is analogous to the sun creating a dent in the flat plane, but that's not what we actually see in 3D space...the sun and planets are essentially in the same plane.

Perhaps rather than getting stuck on the word 'curvature' we could consider the 'behavior' of spacetime instead (an attractive force between masses rather than a physical slope shown in the drawing).

Interesting.


neutrino said:
The bowling-ball analogy strikes again. ;)

What do you mean?
 
  • #10
pivoxa15 said:
What do you mean?
To explain space-time curvature in non-technical terms, most physicists describe how a heavy bowling ball placed on a trampoline creates a dent, in which smaller marbles take different trajectories. I believe it was Einstein who came up with this in the first place(I could be wrong, though). Although it gives a vague idea, it's very misleading, because people start associating a 'down' direction in space, and stuff like that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K