Is the Translation of Open and Closed Sets in R^n Also Open or Closed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Appa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Sets
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 4K views
Appa
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let A be a subset of Rn and let [tex]\vec{w}[/tex] be a point in Rn. Show that A is open if and only if A + [tex]\vec{w}[/tex] is open.
Show that A is closed if and only if A + [tex]\vec{w}[/tex] is closed.

Homework Equations



The translate of A by [tex]\vec{w}[/tex] is defined by
A + [tex]\vec{w}[/tex] := {[tex]\vec{w}[/tex] + [tex]\vec{u}[/tex] | [tex]\vec{u}[/tex] in A}

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to solve this componentwise:
[tex]\vec{u}[/tex] = {pi(ui)}, 1<=i<=n, so that [tex]\vec{u}[/tex] + [tex]\vec{w}[/tex] = {pi(ui) +pi(ui)}
But I'm not all that sure whether I'm on the right track..!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can just brute force the definition of open: If you have a point u in A, you have a small ball around it contained in A, and that ball will be translated into A+w. You should be able to see how that gives you that A+w is open