- 8,252
- 2,664
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_2325093.html...The swing is set on a 700ft high viewing platform on the tower in Harbin city, Heilongjiang province [continued w/photo]
Last edited by a moderator:
The discussion revolves around the thrill and safety of the world's highest swing located in Harbin, China. Participants share their personal feelings about heights, thrill-seeking behavior, and the psychological aspects of engaging in extreme activities. The conversation touches on the nature of bravery versus thrill-seeking and includes anecdotes about other adrenaline-inducing experiences.
Participants generally express a mix of excitement and fear regarding the swing, with no clear consensus on whether it represents bravery or thrill-seeking. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the motivations behind engaging in such extreme activities and the safety concerns associated with them.
Participants express varying assumptions about bravery, thrill-seeking, and safety, with some relying on personal experiences that may not apply universally. The discussion includes unresolved technical details about aircraft safety and the mechanics of extreme activities.
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_2325093.html...The swing is set on a 700ft high viewing platform on the tower in Harbin city, Heilongjiang province [continued w/photo]
Chi Meson said:I want a swing with a 700 foot long chain!
How long can you pump that sucker!
The swing is called "Game for brave people", reports Harbin Daily.
loseyourname said:I don't get that. Bravery, to me, means doing something out of the ordinary to achieve an end that is worth sacrificing your own safety for. Swinging 700 ft. above a city just to prove you're not scared doesn't really jive with that. It seems more like thrill-seeking or ego-massaging if you're actually trying to prove a point by doing it.
Danger said:I got one look at that picture, and my 'nads shrivelled up and tried to hide behind my tonsils. I can't stand even thinking about that thing.
loseyourname said:I don't get that. Bravery, to me, means doing something out of the ordinary to achieve an end that is worth sacrificing your own safety for. Swinging 700 ft. above a city just to prove you're not scared doesn't really jive with that. It seems more like thrill-seeking or ego-massaging if you're actually trying to prove a point by doing it.

You know that thing you used to do when you were a kid. You would lean back on the swing until your body was horizontal and then you would stick your head down so you would see the ground coming up at you, upside down. -They should do that.
Chi Meson said:Dude, you got the wrong name then.

radou said:It's not about bravery, it's about "adrenaline", eg "thrill-seeking", as you said. There are two types of people in the world; the ones who like thrills and the ones who don't. And I'm proud to be one of the most outstanding representatives of the former type.![]()
cyrusabdollahi said:I don't remember those airplanes in the air combat programs having ejection seats.![]()
turbo-1 said:That might be fun for someone who has a fear of heights. I've engaged in all sorts of adrenaline-producing activities including skiing downhill flat-out in conditions that were sometimes a bit touchy , but perhaps the most fun was running heavy (class 4-5) whitewater in a low volume kayak or a canoe. Water is relentless and powerful, and every day is different. Sitting on a swing can't bring those rushes.
cyrusabdollahi said:HAAAAHAHAAHAHAH, yeah, right. When the plane goes uncontrollable, the g-forces are going to plant you into your seat.
Otherwise, hell do a controlled landing into a field. That parachute was just to make you feel good when you die, with it strapped on, while strapped to your seat, becasue you never could get out the plane.
When your doing those kinds of high g manuvers, the airplanes "fails" when the wings fold due to high streses. You're not getting out of that airplane w/o an ejection seat, sorry.
Ivan Seeking said:No doubt, any collision or structural failure was going to be bad news, but he seemed most concerned about having a fire for some reason.
cyrusabdollahi said:To be honest, I don't see any reason why the plane should burst into flames under high g unless its a piece of junk. I could understand him worrying about snapping the wings off, but fire?-its a piston aircraft.
cyrusabdollahi said:But doing a loop does not increase vibrations, mass imbalances create vibrations.
Same goes for fuel lines. I don't really see a fuel line failing because the engine is flowing a high fuel rate. They are rated to take that type of flow rate.