Dale
Mentor
- 36,432
- 15,148
And why isn't it established in the peer reviewed literature? Many professional scientists (myself included) prefer the block universe interpretation. Experimental evidence conclusively excluding alternative models would surely be of interest to the community. So, if entanglement could be used to experimentally decide the question, why would the peer reviewed literature be silent on the topic?bobc2 said:I'm afraid that the inference one could draw from this result, which is compatible with the 4-D loaf model and not compatible with an evolving-with-time 3-D model (such as LET), is a discussion that would be considered out of bounds for this PF since it has not been established in the peer reviewed literature.
There simply is no such experiment. Neither with entanglement nor any other mechanism. There cannot be any such experiment since both models use the same Lorentz transform to make all of their experimental predictions.