Is There a Downloadable Package of LaTeX Symbols Available?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Martyn Arthur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Latex Symbols
AI Thread Summary
A downloadable package of LaTeX symbols is not necessary, as users can type commands directly to create symbols. Resources like the "LaTeX Guide" provide essential information on using LaTeX, including how to format in-line and stand-alone equations. For personal document creation, LaTeX compilers are available, and users should specify their operating system for tailored advice. Additionally, features like "lazy LaTeX rendering" improve page load times, and users can preview their LaTeX using external websites. Familiarity with LaTeX commands and formatting is key to effective usage.
Martyn Arthur
Messages
114
Reaction score
20
TL;DR Summary: Looking for downloadable package of symbols

Hi; I am picking up on the suggestion of using LAtex.
I know the symbols are mostly in Word scattered about the place.
Is there a downloadable package do you know that I could access please.
Thanks
Martyn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just click on the link "LaTeX Guide" lower left above "Attach Files" to get started.
 
In LaTeX you type commands, not paste in symbols. For instance, to get "gamma is not equal to capital delta" you type \gamma \neq \Delta. Put that between double hashmarks and you get ##\gamma\neq\Delta##. You don't need to download any symbols - just keep a google page open so you can look up the command when you forget one! As kuruman has noted, there's a "how to use LaTeX on PF" linked below the reply box.

Or are you trying to write documents in LaTeX for personal notes, like you might in Word? You can get LaTeX compilers that do that. If that's what you want to do, are you on Windows or what?
 
There is a helpful "LaTeX Guide" link below the Edit window to get you started. Note that you put double-$ delimiters at the start and end of each stand-alone line of LaTeX, and double-# delimiters at the start and end of in-line LaTeX that does not need to be on its own line.

Example of in-line LaTeX: ##v(t) = L \frac{di(t)}{dt}##

Example of stand-alone LaTeX:
$$v(t) = L \frac{di(t)}{dt}$$
Also, if you right-click on a LaTeX equation in a post, you get a pop-up menu to let you view the LaTeX source or view it in other formats.

LaTeX isn't supported in thread titles, so you can use simple text math in titles if you want.

Note also that PF uses a feature called "lazy LaTeX rendering" that speeds up page loads. When you first post your LaTeX in a thread, you will not see it rendered that first time. Just refresh your browser page to force it to be rendered, and then it should render whenever you come back to that page/thread in the future.

If you have trouble using the Preview feature to check your LaTeX, you can use a website such as https://www.quicklatex.com/ or https://latexeditor.lagrida.com/ to preview your LaTeX before you post it.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top