Is There a General Formula for Finding the Nth Power of a 2x2 Matrix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pbandjay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Power
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the Nth power of a 2x2 real matrix, specifically within the context of SL(2,R) where the determinant is constrained to 1. The user attempts to utilize the diagonalization method, An = PDnP-1, but encounters difficulties in deriving eigenvectors from the eigenvalues calculated using the characteristic polynomial. The eigenvalues are determined to be λ1,2 = (a+d ± √((a+d)² - 4))/2, yet the user struggles to find non-trivial eigenvectors, concluding that not every 2x2 matrix is diagonalizable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 2x2 matrix operations
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Knowledge of the diagonalization process
  • Basic concepts of linear algebra, particularly in the context of SL(2,R)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of diagonalization for 2x2 matrices in detail
  • Learn about the implications of non-diagonalizable matrices
  • Explore the Jordan canonical form for matrices
  • Investigate numerical methods for computing matrix powers
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, matrix theory, and applications in physics or engineering.

pbandjay
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find the Nth power of a general 2x2 real matrix. This seemed simple at first, but I am running into trouble of finding general eigenvectors and cannot figure out where to go.

A = \begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix} \mbox{ with } a,b,c,d \in \mathbb{R}

For my purposes, it is an element of SL(2,R), therefore det(A) = ad - bc = 1. I am trying to find An using An = PDnP-1. To find the eigenvalues:

\det(A - \lambda{I_2}) = \left| \begin{array}{cc} a - \lambda & b \\ c & d - \lambda \end{array} \right| = (a-\lambda)(d-\lambda) - bc = \lambda^2 - (a + d)\lambda + ad - bc = \lambda^2 - (a + d)\lambda + 1 = 0

\lambda_{1,2} = \frac{a+d \pm \sqrt{(a+d)^2 - 4}}{2}

To find eigenvectors:

\left( \begin{array}{cc} a & b \\ c & d \end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array}{c} x \\ y \end{array} \right) = \lambda \left( \begin{array}{c} x \\ y \end{array} \right)

ax + by = \lambda x
cx + dy = \lambda y

Solving the first for y and inserting y into the second equation:

y = \frac{x(\lambda - a)}{b}

cx + \frac{dx(\lambda - a)}{b} = \frac{\lambda x(\lambda - a)}{b}

The only solution I can see for this is (x,y) = (0,0), whether I use for first or second eigenvalue, which doesn't make sense to me. I would think that there would have to be some way to find a general formula since it is easy to use this method to find numerical examples of diagonalization and such. Or maybe I am missing something. My knowledge of linear algebra isn't very strong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
pbandjay said:
To find eigenvectors …

Hi pbandjay! :smile:

(nice LaTeX, btw :wink:)

For the eigenvectors, all you need is the ratio y/x,

so just go back to your y = x(λ - a)/b (or y = xc/(λ - d), which is the same thing). :smile:
 
Ah, of course. That helps a lot, thank you!

I finally found the formula for An, but I'm afraid it isn't telling me what I expected. I may have think of some other ways to solve my question. But thank you!
 
Last edited:
Not every 2 x 2 matrix is diagonalizable.
 
pbandjay said:
The only solution I can see for this is (x,y) = (0,0)
q=0 is not the only solution to pq=0...
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K