Is there a greater answer for naming D-Block elements the way they do?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of shorthand notation in electron configurations, specifically for D-Block elements like manganese, which is represented as [Ar]4s2 3d5. This shorthand is not merely a convenience; it highlights the stability of non-valence electron configurations that remain consistent across higher elements. The practice allows chemists to simplify complex configurations while acknowledging the underlying stability of these electrons in the periodic table. This approach aids in understanding electron arrangements without losing sight of their significance in chemical behavior.
PhysicsInterest
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
Ok so I’m going into my second year of college and I’m starting to learn more advanced chemistry (pray for me🙏) I’m currently on the topic of D-Block elements and I was already aware of electron configurations and how to write them out… however what I have never come across prior was the use of another elements electron configuration to almost ‘shorten’ writing out one for example the electron configuration of manganese is [Ar]4s2 3d5 (embarrassing if I wrote it wrong but please correct me if I did) I had a general question, is there a deeper meaning behind using another electron configuration in a configuration or is it just chemists taking a shorter route and almost being lazy lol😆 any experienced chemist please respond, I’m a baby chemist trying to learn!! Thank you a million.😁
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
In a way - both. Yes, it is "just" a short notation, but it also reflects on the fact non-valence electron configurations are quite stable and identical in every "higher" element.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes berkeman, topsquark and Bystander
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top