Is There a Hidden Universal Constant that Affects All Branches of Science?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter microedit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nobel prize
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the proposition of a hidden universal constant that purportedly affects all branches of science. The scope includes theoretical implications, speculative reasoning, and the potential for this concept to unify various scientific disciplines.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that astronauts float in space due to a "vacuum space" constant that allows particles to pass through matter, suggesting this constant is not acknowledged by classical and modern scientists like Newton and Einstein.
  • The same participant claims that this vacuum constant affects various physical systems, such as oxygen availability for divers and climbers, and proposes that it should be given mathematical value.
  • Another participant humorously nominates themselves for a Nobel Prize in response to the initial proposition.
  • A later post mentions that the proposer has not yet named this constant but claims to have gathered evidence for its existence by eliminating known scientific variables.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the validity of the proposition, stating that speculative ideas do not qualify for a Nobel Prize and suggesting that such posts are not appropriate for the forum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are competing views regarding the validity and appropriateness of the proposed constant and its implications for science.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes speculative claims that lack established scientific backing and relies on personal interpretations of scientific principles. The limitations of the proposed constant are not fully explored, and the discussion remains open-ended regarding its acceptance in the scientific community.

microedit
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Although I can't nominate myself for a Nobel Prize, I was wondering I any distinguished scientist would oppose such a nomination.
Here are the scientific propositions.

Astronauts are able to float when in space are but inside their space shuttle. But they are also able to breath oxygen. Sea divers also must use a set amount of air pressure to receive proper amounts of oxygen. When high mountain climbing one of the first physical systems to change in the body is the amount of oxygen one gets while breathing. Vacuum "space" is an unseen constant evident by particles able to go thru other forms of matter such as glass. Well, there are other forces such as magnetism that also go through matter with this unabstructed nonlimitation. In works of classical and modern scientists such as Newton and Einstein they make no references to these facts as a universal constant. So by defining this physical vacuum that is able to go through all of matter and giving it mathematical value and meaning because it affects all branches of science I am humble (as the researcher and discoverer).

Please note that energy, matter and forces as a byproducts of matter or energy have been ruled out as this universal constant. The date being 02/10/2012. My name Adam Luis Hugo 0667. I would also like to add that physical evidence show offset of energy and matter by this constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I nominate... you!(I mean me!)
 
Last edited:
P.S. I haven't named this constant yet although I have done the research of its abstraction from eliminating known science related variables in their own branches of disciplines. I have acquired "Preponderance of the Evidence" of such a constant or physical variable or previously unknown scientific principle. And now I'm publishing publicly on this forum with this thread.
 
I'm sorry, but I don't think you're going to get your Nobel. You won't get the Nobel Prize for a, as you put it, "scientific proposition". You get the Nobel Prize for making an important contribution to science.

Speculative posts like this are anyway not allowed on this forum. So keep rocking, but somewhere else.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K