MHB Is there a non-regular hexagon

  • Thread starter Thread starter highmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hexagon
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of hexagons, particularly the misconception that a hexagon with equal side lengths must also have equal angles. It is clarified that while a regular hexagon is both equilateral and equiangular, there are examples of equiangular polygons that are not equilateral and vice versa. The conversation highlights that polygons with more than three sides can be "warped," allowing for variations in angles while maintaining equal side lengths. Additionally, it is noted that the relationship between equilateral and equiangular properties differs for odd and even-sided polygons. The thread concludes with an acknowledgment of the complexities involved in polygon geometry.
highmath
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
How can I prove that If there the only hexagon that his sides equal one to each other then it angles can't be different one from each other?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think that's true.
 
Indeed it is not true. For example, the hexagon on the left below is equiangular but not equilateral while the one on the right is equilateral but not equiangular.

f3030fe49a2e38430df456d9a6212bda.png
245cf64ce6652da787f48a5f0d431a84.png

In general, for any integer $n\geqslant3$, if $n$ is odd, then any $n$-gon is equilateral if and only if it is equilateral, but if $n$ is even, there will be $n$-gons that are equilateral but not equiangular and ones that are equiangular but not equilateral. For instance, in the case of quadrilaterals, a rectangle is equiangular but not equilateral, while a rhombus is equilateral but not equiangular.

I suspect you want to prove your result for a heptagon ($n=7$) rather than hexagon. Can you do that? Hint:
If $n$ is even, then it is possible to have an $n$-gon with all opposite sides parallel. This is why such a polygon can be equiangular but not equilateral (you simply make one pair of opposite sides longer than the others). Also it is possible to have a polygon with all vertices forming diagonally opposite pairs. This explains how such a polygon can be equilateral but not equiangular (you can alter its interior angles making sure that diagonally opposite ones are equal).

Can you see why neither of the above scenarios is possible for a polygon with an odd number of sides?
 
Last edited:
Olinguito said:
Indeed it is not true. For example, the hexagon on the left below is equiangular but not equilateral while the one on the right is equilateral but not equiangular.
[/SPOILER]

First of All - thanks!

Can you post a picture of equiangular polygon (for example, heagox) that is not equilateral?
 
highmath said:
How can I prove that If there the only hexagon that his sides equal one to each other then it angles can't be different one from each other?
You can't because that is not true! Imagine a regular hexagon- all sides the same length and all angle the same, made of sticks "pinned" together- that is, two sticks are held together by a simple pin through holes in the two sticks so that the sticks can rotate around that pin. Now grab two opposite sides and move one left and the other right. The regular hexagon will "warp" into a hexagon still with all sides the same length but non-equal angles.

Only triangles are "rigid". Any figure with more that three sides can be "warped" into figures with the same side length but different angles.
 
highmath said:
Can you post a picture of equiangular polygon (for example, heagox) that is not equilateral?

Equiangular non-equilateral octagon:
1b6ec6c3875f31ba9da2c0e3e1b55a0f.png


Equiangular non-equilateral decagon:
59492cb9c9d16599bef62787fbaa6f53.png


And an equilateral non-equiangular (and non-convex) dodecagon:
5f95db71130ad76e47f4bdad99ffad07.png
 
Olinguito said:
In general, for any integer $n\geqslant3$, if $n$ is odd, then any $n$-gon is equilateral if and only if it is equilateral …

I should point out that this is only true for convex polygons, not concave ones.
 
Olinguito said:
In general, for any integer $n\geqslant3$, if $n$ is odd, then any $n$-gon is equilateral if and only if it is equilateral

As written, that statement is true (but vacuous)! From the rest of the thread, it seems that the second "equilateral" should have been "equiangular". The statement would then say "if $n$ is odd, then any $n$-gon is equilateral if and only if it is equiangular". But that statement is not true (as Country Boy pointed out in comment #5). In fact, a child's drawing of a house shows that you can have an equilateral convex pentagon that is not equiangular.

[TIKZ]\draw (0,0) -- (0,2) -- (1,3.732) -- (2,2) -- (2,0) -- cycle;[/TIKZ]
 
Olinguito said:
And an equilateral non-equiangular (and non-convex) dodecagon:
5f95db71130ad76e47f4bdad99ffad07.png


This is an equilateral equiangular polygon.
It's also a regular polygon and a concave polygon.
See for instance wiki on regular polygon.
 
  • #10
Klaas van Aarsen said:
This is an equilateral equiangular polygon.

It’s not. By equiangular I mean that all the interior angles are equal. (Wink)

Anyway, thanks to everyone for pointing out my mistakes. I should have thought more carefully before posting.
 
Back
Top