mohanrajs26
- 1
- 0
Can we built the small passenger car body using ANY WOOD which is STRONGER and CHEAPER?
If so, name the wood.
If so, name the wood.
The discussion centers on the feasibility of using wood as a material for building small passenger car frames. Participants agree that while wood, specifically ash, has been successfully used in the past by manufacturers like Morgan for sports cars, it does not match the strength-to-weight ratios of modern materials such as aluminum and carbon steel. The consensus is that no wood can currently provide a stronger and cheaper alternative for car frames, primarily due to safety concerns and energy absorption capabilities in collisions.
PREREQUISITESAutomotive engineers, material scientists, and enthusiasts interested in the intersection of traditional materials and modern automotive design.
mohanrajs26 said:Can we built the small passenger car body using ANY WOOD which is STRONGER and CHEAPER?
If so, name the wood.
brewnog said:Morgan have been doing a good job making sports cars using ash frames for one hundred years. They're still good by today's standards.
Mech_Engineer said:Let's be honest- the Morgan cars are bought for their styling, not because of their competitive performance or impressive Ash frame technology...
brewnog said:Nonsense, I've been successfully campaigning one this season and don't even like the look of the thing! Although if by "competitive" you mean "with other marques" then you may have a point. Still, faster round a track than lots of stuff made solely from 'modern' materials!
odmart01 said:realize that these cars won't absorb as much energy from collisions like a metal does. malleability of metals are critical for this.
Borek said:Lightning struck is so rare it can be safely ignored as a problem.
Mech_Engineer said:The OP's original question was if a "car's body frame" could be made out of a wood which is stronger and cheaper. In my opinion, the answer is still "no."