Is there a way to replace nuclear power with a (big) hydrogen fuel cell

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feasibility of using a large hydrogen fuel cell as a replacement for nuclear power in supplying energy to millions of people. Participants explore various aspects of hydrogen production, efficiency, and the potential advantages and disadvantages of hydrogen as an energy source compared to traditional nuclear power.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a large hydrogen fuel cell could be a safer alternative to nuclear reactors for power generation.
  • Others argue that hydrogen is not a naturally occurring fuel source and requires energy for its production, making it a net loss in terms of efficiency.
  • Concerns are raised about the methods of hydrogen production, with questions about the energy source for electrolysis and whether solar power could be used effectively for this purpose.
  • Some participants suggest that there are more efficient methods of producing hydrogen using sunlight than traditional solar panels, such as thermochemical and photochemical cycles.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for high-temperature electrolysis in nuclear reactors to produce hydrogen, which could then be used in fuel cells more efficiently than conventional power generation methods.
  • Questions are raised about the scale and efficiency required for hydrogen fuel cells to meet the energy needs of millions, as well as the practicality of individual fuel cells for residential use.
  • Historical references are made to the use of fuel cell technology in the Apollo missions, with inquiries about advancements in the technology since then.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the viability of hydrogen fuel cells as a replacement for nuclear power, with no consensus reached on the efficiency or practicality of hydrogen as an energy source.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include unresolved questions about the efficiency of various hydrogen production methods, the energy losses involved in hydrogen production and usage, and the specific requirements for hydrogen fuel cells to power large populations.

baywax
Gold Member
Messages
2,175
Reaction score
1
Could one really big hydrogen fuel cell battery replace a nuclear reactor in providing power to millions of people? This may end up being a safer option for generating power.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
baywax said:
Could one really big hydrogen fuel cell battery replace a nuclear reactor in providing power to millions of people? This may end up being a safer option for generating power.

Sure.

But what are you going to use to produce the Hydrogen? Electrolysis on seawater? And the energy for that comes from... ?
 
No. Coincidentally someone answered a related thread with the perfect explanation. Hydrogen is not naturally occurring, you need to use energy to produce hydrogen. Hydrogen is only useful as a storage medium. You create hydrogen and can use it in hydrogen powered automobiles for example. However, it's a net loss, you need energy to create it and then you use it, with less than 100% efficiency, for something else such as powering a car. It's not a fuel source such as naturally occurring oil, sunlight, wind power etc.
 
russ_watters said:
That sounds vaguely familiar... :-p

I think you copied me in another thread...
 
Pengwuino said:
No. Coincidentally someone answered a related thread with the perfect explanation. Hydrogen is not naturally occurring, you need to use energy to produce hydrogen. Hydrogen is only useful as a storage medium. You create hydrogen and can use it in hydrogen powered automobiles for example. However, it's a net loss, you need energy to create it and then you use it, with less than 100% efficiency, for something else such as powering a car. It's not a fuel source such as naturally occurring oil, sunlight, wind power etc.

So using solar power to produce the hydrogen would be redundant... when you could simply generate the power with the solar power?
 
baywax said:
So using solar power to produce the hydrogen would be redundant... when you could simply generate the power with the solar power?

No. There are many prospective methods of producing hydrogen with sunlight that are much more efficient and cheaper than just using solar panels. Thermochemical and photochemical cycles can reach efficiencies more than double that of similar priced solar cells and using SOFCs (~70% efficient) to generate electricity.

You can also generate hydrogen via high temperature electrolysis in a nuclear reactor and use fuel cells generate power more efficiently than you can with a typical rankin cycle design.
 
Using solar power to produce hydrogen also allows you to store the solar energy.
 
RandomGuy88 said:
Using solar power to produce hydrogen also allows you to store the solar energy.

Solar power isn't particularly efficient as it is (30% at best?).

Allowing for energy loss during the process of extracting the Hydrogen, you get a very inefficient system.

Other renewable sources may be better suited.
 
  • #10
Topher925 said:
No. There are many prospective methods of producing hydrogen with sunlight that are much more efficient and cheaper than just using solar panels. Thermochemical and photochemical cycles can reach efficiencies more than double that of similar priced solar cells and using SOFCs (~70% efficient) to generate electricity.

You can also generate hydrogen via high temperature electrolysis in a nuclear reactor and use fuel cells generate power more efficiently than you can with a typical rankin cycle design.

Ok. Very good to hear that. Kind of a play on photosynthesis or a metabolic system that produces hydrogen.

Also a good comment about how using solar energy to produce hydrogen is a form of storing solar energy for later use.

How big and how efficient would a hydrogen fuel cell... or fuel cell of any kind... have to be to power millions of people's needs? Or would it be profitable and safer etc... to include the individual fuel cells with each residence or apartment etc...?

Also, since fuel cell batteries were used during the Apollo series missions ( around 1969), haven't they been perfected to a point of being able to power helicopters and so on?
 

Similar threads

Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 191 ·
7
Replies
191
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K