Is there a way to show that sqrt(2)+sqrt(3)+sqrt(5) is algebraic over Q?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ~Death~
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether the expression sqrt(2) + sqrt(3) + sqrt(5) is algebraic over the rational numbers Q. Participants explore various approaches to demonstrate this, including polynomial construction and properties of algebraic numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the distinction between algebraic and rational numbers.
  • One participant suggests that algebraic numbers are closed under addition and seeks a way to demonstrate this property.
  • A participant recalls a treatment of algebraic numbers from a calculus text, noting that if a > 0 is algebraic, then sqrt(a) is also algebraic.
  • Another participant proposes a method to eliminate radicals from the equation x = sqrt(2) + sqrt(3) + sqrt(5) to find a polynomial of degree 8 that has this expression as a root.
  • One participant introduces a theorem related to algebraic numbers and linear dependence in vector spaces over Q, suggesting it may provide an alternative proof approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method to show that sqrt(2) + sqrt(3) + sqrt(5) is algebraic over Q. Multiple competing views and approaches remain, with some uncertainty about the properties of algebraic numbers.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to eliminate radicals and construct a polynomial, but the exact steps and assumptions involved in this process are not fully resolved. There is also a lack of clarity on the implications of the theorem regarding linear dependence.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying algebra, particularly in understanding algebraic numbers and their properties, as well as students seeking to explore methods of polynomial construction involving radicals.

~Death~
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi,

i can't figure out this problem in my algebra book

I thought it was interesting that this thing was rational though...

anyone know how to start it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think i figured it out i might have been confused on the difference between algebraic and rational

idk how to show that algebraic numbers are closed under + though
 
Erg, so there was a tiny treatment of algebraic numbers in Spivak's calculus text, but basically I have forgotten that chapter. But I think there was a trivial exercise where you show that if a > 0 is algebraic, then sqrt(a) is also algebraic. Also, intuitively, it seems true that the sum of algebraic numbers is also algebraic. On the other hand, there is probably an easier way.
 
~Death~ said:
Hi,

i can't figure out this problem in my algebra book

I thought it was interesting that this thing was rational though...

anyone know how to start it?

In this particular case it is enough to find a polynomial (with integer coefficients) that has this as a root. It will be a polynomial of degree 8.

Start with equation x = \sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}+\sqrt{5} then eliminate the radicals ... isolate a radical on one side, then square. It takes three times to get rid of all three radicals, you end up with x squared three times so you have x^8 in your polynomial.

I get
-40\,x^6+576-960\,x^2+352\,x^4+x^8 = 0
 
snipez90 said:
Also, intuitively, it seems true that the sum of algebraic numbers is also algebraic. On the other hand, there is probably an easier way.
The easiest way I can think is in terms of vector spaces over Q. (Meaning that you can only use rational numbers as scalars, rather than arbitrary real or complex numbers)
Theorem: A complex number a is algebraic over Q if and only if its powers 1, a, a2, a3, ... are linearly dependent.​
Can you prove this theorem? Can you see how to leverage linear algebra to prove the result you want?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K