Is there action at a distance at the atomic level in physics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sahashmi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of atomic interactions, questioning whether they occur through forces propagating in space or as action at a distance. Classical physics suggests that electromagnetic forces mediate atomic interactions, while quantum mechanics indicates that such interactions cannot be described in classical terms. The S-Matrix, a key tool in quantum electrodynamics (QED), mathematically describes interactions like electron-positron scattering, emphasizing that classical explanations are inadequate. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the limitations of classical physics in explaining quantum phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of quantum electrodynamics (QED)
  • Basic grasp of the S-Matrix and its applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the S-Matrix and its role in particle physics
  • Study Bhabha scattering and its significance in quantum interactions
  • Explore Wheeler-Feynman’s theory of action at a distance
  • Examine the implications of quantum mechanics on classical physics concepts
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational principles of atomic interactions and the limitations of classical theories.

sahashmi
Messages
96
Reaction score
18
TL;DR
See title
When atoms interact each other, are they interacting through some form of force that propagates between the atoms, or is this action occurring at a distance?

Newton’s gravity theory famously posited action at a distance: objects affecting each other at a distance with nothing propagating between them in space. Now, we know that gravitational waves propagate between masses.

I’m now curious as to whether interactions in the atomic realm are “at a distance” or always through forces propagating through space
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sahashmi said:
TL;DR Summary: See title

When atoms interact each other, are they interacting through some form of force that propagates between the atoms, or is this action occurring at a distance?

Newton’s gravity theory famously posited action at a distance: objects affecting each other at a distance with nothing propagating between them in space. Now, we know that gravitational waves propagate between masses.

I’m now curious as to whether interactions in the atomic realm are “at a distance” or always through forces propagating through space
You can treat the problem classically, in which case the forces between atoms are electromagnetic, so carried by the electromagnetic field, no action at a distance. Of course this treatment will only work in a few cases; more often we get results that don't match observation, such as the classical prediction that atoms are unstable.
Or you can treat the problem quantum mechanically, in which case the question is meaningless - there's no notion of forces propagating between particles located at points in space. We get results that match our measurement result and that's as good as it gets with QM.

Newton’s gravity theory famously posited action at a distance: objects affecting each other at a distance with nothing propagating between them in space. Now, we know that gravitational waves propagate between masses.
Off topic here, but that second sentence is a non-sequitur, unrelated to the first.
 
Last edited:
sahashmi said:
When atoms interact each other, are they interacting through some form of force that propagates between the atoms, or is this action occurring at a distance?
How would you do an experiment to tell the difference?

sahashmi said:
Newton’s gravity theory famously posited action at a distance: objects affecting each other at a distance with nothing propagating between them in space. Now, we know that gravitational waves propagate between masses.
"Gravitational waves propagate between masses" is not how, for example, the Earth and other planets remain within the Sun's gravitational field in GR. GR does predict gravitational waves, but it does not say that all "gravitational interactions" between masses are due to propagating gravitational waves.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and russ_watters
sahashmi said:
TL;DR Summary: See title

I’m now curious as to whether interactions in the atomic realm are “at a distance” or always through forces propagating through space
Neither. It was Heisenberg who first realised that interaction between elementary particles could only be described mathematically. These mathematical calculations are what modern particle physics is all about. The main tool in this respect is the so-called S-Matrix, derived from QED/QFT:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-matrix

For example, electron-positron interactions are described as Bhabha scattering. This was first calculated by Bhabha in 1935. If you were a graduate particle-physics student this is what you would spend your time learning:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhabha_scattering
 
This is just a refusal to accept quantum theory. You want a classical explanation, and because there cannot be a local classical one, you look for an "action at a distance" classical explanation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy
martinbn said:
This is just a refusal to accept quantum theory. You want a classical explanation, and because there cannot be a local classical one, you look for an "action at a distance" classical explanation.
No, I want an explanation, “classical” or not
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy
Nice, provocative question. As a starter, look into Wheeler-Feynman’s theory; perhaps the Wikipedia article on action at a distance. But keep it “low” and confine it to electromagnetism only.
 
sahashmi said:
No, I want an explanation, “classical” or not
Well, quantum mechanics is an explanation! But you don't accept it. You want a different one, you want a classical one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
sahashmi said:
I want an explanation, “classical” or not
What your posts show that you want is to keep harping on the same questions regardless of the answers you get. Enough is enough.

This thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and weirdoguy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
621
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
658
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K